0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Surface functional groups on nanoplastics delay the recovery of gut microbiota after combined exposure to sulfamethazine in marine medaka (Oryzias melastigma)

Aquatic Toxicology 2023 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Feipeng Wang, Chaoyue Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Chaoyue Zhang, Hongxing Chen, Zhi Zhang, Mingdong Zhang, Jingli Mu Mingdong Zhang, Feipeng Wang, Chaoyue Zhang, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Lingtian Xie, Chaoyue Zhang, Yu Zhang, Hongxing Chen, Hongxing Chen, Yu Zhang, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Zhi Zhang, Jingli Mu Feipeng Wang, Zhi Zhang, Lingtian Xie, Lingtian Xie, Jingli Mu Lingtian Xie, Yu Zhang, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Yu Zhang, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Lingtian Xie, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Lingtian Xie, Jingli Mu Yu Zhang, Lingtian Xie, Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu Jingli Mu

Summary

Researchers found that surface-modified nanoplastics (with carboxyl or amino groups) delayed the recovery of gut microbiota in marine medaka fish after combined exposure with the antibiotic sulfamethazine, compared to plain polystyrene nanoplastics. The modified nanoplastics were expelled more slowly from the fish and released more of the adsorbed antibiotic during digestion. The study suggests that real-world nanoplastics, which typically carry surface functional groups from environmental weathering, may pose greater risks to gut health than pristine particles.

Polymers

Nanoplastics can interact with antibiotics, altering their bioavailability and the ensuing toxicity in marine organisms. It is reported that plain polystyrene (PS) nanoplastics decrease the bioavailability and adverse effects of sulfamethazine (SMZ) on the gut microbiota in Oryzias melastigma. However, the influence of surface functional groups on the combined effects with SMZ remains largely unknown. In this study, adult O. melastigma were fed diet amended with 4.62 mg/g SMZ and 3.65 mg/g nanoplastics (i.e., plain PS, PS-COOH and PS-NH) for 30 days (F0-E), followed by a depuration period of 21 days (F0-D). In addition, the eggs produced on the last day of exposure were cultured under standard protocols without further exposure for 2 months (F1 fish). The results showed that the alpha diversity or the bacterial community of gut microbiota did not differ among the SMZ + PS, SMZ + PS-COOH, and SMZ + PS-NH groups in the F0-E and F1 fish. Interestingly, during the depuration, a clear recovery of gut microbiota (e.g., increases in the alpha diversity, beneficial bacteria abundances and network complexity) was found in the SMZ + PS group, but not for the SMZ + PS-COOH and SMZ + PS-NH groups, indicating that PS-COOH and PS-NH could prolong the toxic effect of SMZ and hinder the recovery of gut microbiota. Compared to plain PS, lower egestion rates of PS-COOH and PS-NH were observed in O. melastigma. In addition, under the simulated fish digest conditions, the SMZ-loaded PS-NH was found to desorb more SMZ than the loaded PS and PS-COOH. These results suggested that the surface -COOH and -NH groups on PS could influence their egestion efficiency and the adsorption/desorption behavior with SMZ, resulting in a long-lasting SMZ stress in the gut during the depuration phase. Our findings highlight the complexity of the carrier effect and ecological risk of surface-charged nanoplastics and the interactions between nanoplastics and antibiotics in natural environments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper