0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Life Cycle Assessment of Laboratory Analytical Workflows for Microplastics Quantification in Environmental Matrices: Sargassum and Seagrass Approach

Preprints.org 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ramón Fernando Colmenares-Quintero, Laura Stefanía Corredor-Muñoz, Juan Carlos Colmenares, Sara Piedrahita-Rodríguez

Summary

Researchers applied life cycle assessment (LCA) to the laboratory workflows used for quantifying microplastics in marine vegetation—specifically Sargassum seaweed and seagrass—to measure the environmental footprint of the analytical procedures themselves. The study found that chemical digestion and spectroscopic analysis steps dominated the environmental impact, providing a baseline for designing more sustainable microplastic monitoring protocols.

Microplastic quantification in marine vegetated ecosystems remains analytically demanding, yet little is known about the environmental footprint of the laboratory procedures required to isolate and measure these particles. This study applies Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to laboratory analytical workflows for microplastics quantification, focusing exclusively on sample preparation and analytical procedures rather than natural environmental absorption or fate processes, in two ecologically relevant matrices: (i) pelagic algae (Sargassum) and (ii) seagrass biomass. Using openLCA 2.5 and the ReCiPe Midpoint (H) v1.13 method, the analysis integrates foreground inventories of digestion, filtration, drying, and spectroscopic identification, combined with background datasets from OzLCI2019, ELCD 3.2 and USDA. Results show substantially higher impacts for the algae scenario, particularly in climate change, human toxicity, ionising radiation and particulate matter formation, largely driven by longer digestion times, increased reagent use and higher energy demand during sample pre-treatment. Conversely, the seagrass scenario exhibited lower burdens per functional unit due to reduced organic complexity and shorter laboratory processing requirements. These findings highlight the importance of matrix-specific methodological choices and the influence of background datasets on impact profiles. The study provides a first benchmark for the environmental performance of microplastic analytical workflows and underscores the need for harmonised, low-impact laboratory protocols to support sustainable monitoring of microplastic pollution in marine ecosystems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Life Cycle Assessment of Laboratory Analytical Workflows for Microplastics Quantification in Environmental Matrices: Sargassum and Seagrass Approach

Researchers applied life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental footprint of laboratory procedures used to quantify microplastics in marine algae and seagrass. The study found that analyzing algae samples had substantially higher environmental impacts than seagrass, largely due to longer processing times and greater reagent use, providing the first benchmark for understanding the environmental costs of microplastic analytical workflows.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics: How green are the methodologies used?

This review evaluated the environmental footprint of the analytical methods used to study microplastics and nanoplastics, finding that many standard protocols rely on hazardous chemicals and high energy use, and recommending greener methodological alternatives.

Article Tier 2

Including impacts of microplastics in marine water and sediments in life cycle assessment

This study developed new methods to measure the environmental impact of microplastics in both ocean water and seafloor sediments, filling a gap in how product environmental footprints are calculated. Previous assessments only considered microplastics floating in water but ignored those that settle into sediments where bottom-dwelling organisms live. Including sediment impacts gives a more complete picture of how plastic pollution from products affects marine life that may eventually enter the human food chain.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in soil: Current status and evaluation of the greenness of various analytical methods of identification

Researchers reviewed the current state of microplastic research in soils, finding some studies report up to 85,000 microplastic particles per kilogram of dry soil, while most existing lab methods for detecting them score poorly on environmental sustainability — calling for greener analytical approaches to match the scale of the problem.

Article Tier 2

Sustainable analytical approaches for microplastics in wastewater, sludge, and landfills: Challenges, fate, and green chemistry perspectives

Researchers reviewed how microplastics travel through wastewater, sewage sludge, and landfills into soils and food crops, where they accumulate alongside heavy metals and pharmaceuticals, raising food safety concerns. The study calls for greener analytical methods and standardized reporting to better track and compare microplastic contamination across studies.

Share this paper