We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Life Cycle Assessment of Laboratory Analytical Workflows for Microplastics Quantification in Environmental Matrices: Sargassum and Seagrass Approach
Summary
Researchers applied life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental footprint of laboratory procedures used to quantify microplastics in marine algae and seagrass. The study found that analyzing algae samples had substantially higher environmental impacts than seagrass, largely due to longer processing times and greater reagent use, providing the first benchmark for understanding the environmental costs of microplastic analytical workflows.
Microplastic quantification in marine vegetated ecosystems remains analytically demanding, yet little is known about the environmental footprint of the laboratory procedures required to isolate and measure these particles. This study applies Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to laboratory analytical workflows for microplastics quantification, focusing exclusively on sample preparation and analytical procedures rather than natural environmental absorption or fate processes, in two ecologically relevant matrices: (i) pelagic algae (Sargassum) and (ii) seagrass biomass. Using the openLCA 2.5 and the ReCiPe Midpoint (H) v1.13 methods, the analysis integrates foreground inventories of digestion, filtration, drying, and spectroscopic identification, combined with background datasets from OzLCI2019, ELCD 3.2 and USDA. Results show substantially higher impacts for the algae scenario, particularly for climate change, human toxicity, ionising radiation and particulate matter formation, largely driven by longer digestion times, increased reagent use and higher energy demand during sample pre-treatment. Conversely, the seagrass scenario exhibited lower burdens per functional unit due to reduced organic complexity and shorter laboratory processing requirements. These findings highlight the importance of matrix-specific methodological choices and the influence of background datasets on impact profiles. This study provides the first benchmark for the environmental performance of microplastic analytical workflows and underscores the need for harmonised, low-impact laboratory protocols to support sustainable monitoring of microplastic pollution in marine ecosystems.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Life Cycle Assessment of Laboratory Analytical Workflows for Microplastics Quantification in Environmental Matrices: Sargassum and Seagrass Approach
Researchers applied life cycle assessment (LCA) to the laboratory workflows used for quantifying microplastics in marine vegetation—specifically Sargassum seaweed and seagrass—to measure the environmental footprint of the analytical procedures themselves. The study found that chemical digestion and spectroscopic analysis steps dominated the environmental impact, providing a baseline for designing more sustainable microplastic monitoring protocols.
Analysis of microplastics and nanoplastics: How green are the methodologies used?
This review evaluated the environmental footprint of the analytical methods used to study microplastics and nanoplastics, finding that many standard protocols rely on hazardous chemicals and high energy use, and recommending greener methodological alternatives.
Value for money: a cost-effectiveness analysis of microplastic analytics in seawater
Researchers surveyed experts and used cost-effectiveness analysis to compare different lab methods for detecting microplastics in seawater, weighing factors like equipment costs, labor, and the ability to confirm a particle is actually plastic. The resulting tools help researchers and policymakers choose the best method for their budget and monitoring goals, a key step toward standardized ocean microplastic tracking.
Including impacts of microplastics in marine water and sediments in life cycle assessment
This study developed new methods to measure the environmental impact of microplastics in both ocean water and seafloor sediments, filling a gap in how product environmental footprints are calculated. Previous assessments only considered microplastics floating in water but ignored those that settle into sediments where bottom-dwelling organisms live. Including sediment impacts gives a more complete picture of how plastic pollution from products affects marine life that may eventually enter the human food chain.
Microplastics in Galway Bay: A comparison of sampling and separation methods
Researchers compared multiple sampling and separation methods for measuring microplastics in benthic sediments in Galway Bay, Ireland, finding significant variation in recovery efficiency between approaches and highlighting the need for standardized methods to enable comparable data across studies.