We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Assessing the impact of shipping on microplastic concentration of filtered samples
Summary
Researchers found that packaging method significantly affects microplastic recovery rates when shipping filtered water samples, with insulated hard or foam coolers retaining approximately 91-92% of polyethylene particles compared to only 10% recovery in flat-rate mailing envelopes.
Abstract Background As microplastics research expands across laboratories worldwide, filtering samples onto inexpensive metal filters and shipping them in metal tins could become the standard practice, replacing the impractical transportation of large water or environmental samples. Despite extensive research on microplastic distribution, there remains a notable absence of standardized methods, including sample transportation, highlighting the need to understand how shipping and packaging methods affect microplastic concentration variability. This study aims to evaluate the influence of different shipping and packaging methods on the recovery rate of microplastic particles that are collected on metal filters. Findings Water samples spiked with polyethylene spheres were filtered onto 20 µm metal filters. The metal meshes were then placed in metal tins and subjected to six different packaging and shipping methods, ranging from paper boxes and envelopes to insulated hard and foam coolers. Laser Direct Infrared Spectroscopy was employed for the detection and quantification of polyethylene particles. The results revealed significant variation in recovery rates based on the shipping method. The highest recovery rates were observed in samples shipped in insulated hard or foam coolers, with at approximately 91–92% of the microplastics retained, while the lowest recovery was found in samples shipped in a flat rate mailing envelope (10%). Paper boxes with materials that eliminate space for movement inside the box offered moderate protection, with recovery rates of approximately 70%. Conclusions This study demonstrates that shipping methods can substantially influence the retention of microplastics during transport from field sites to laboratories for analysis. Shipping methods where the packing remains upward such as with a cooler with a handle provided the highest recovery rates. We infer that this is due to the better care in handling from mail/shipping carriers; however, this method costs more. Lowest recover rates occurred when metal tins could freely move within the packaging and the package was allowed to be in any orientation. The findings highlight the importance of packaging choice in minimizing microplastic loss during shipping. Further research is necessary to standardize sample handling protocols and ensure consistent results across various transportation conditions, ultimately improving the reliability of microplastic contamination assessments.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Assessing the Impact of Shipping on Microplastic Concentration of Filtered Samples
Researchers evaluated the influence of different shipping and packaging methods on microplastic recovery rates from metal filters, using water samples spiked with polyethylene spheres to assess whether filtering and mailing samples in metal tins could serve as a standardized transport method for microplastics research.
Small Microplastic Sampling in Water: Development of an Encapsulated Filtration Device
A new encapsulated filtration device was developed for sampling small microplastics (in the lower micrometer size range) from water, reducing contamination and sample loss compared to standard net methods. Capturing very small microplastics is important because this size range is particularly abundant and potentially most harmful.
Occurrence and Source of Microplastics Contamination in Drinking Water and Performance of Water Treatment Plants in Removing Microplastics
This review summarizes evidence that microplastics are present in both tap water and bottled water worldwide, with bottled water frequently contaminated by particles shed from the plastic packaging itself. Conventional water treatment plants remove between 40% and 93% of microplastics but cannot eliminate them entirely, meaning treated drinking water still carries measurable plastic loads. The chapter highlights the irony that plastic packaging intended to deliver clean water is itself a major source of microplastic contamination.
Efficacy of Microplastic Separation Techniques on Seawater Samples: Testing Accuracy Using High-Density Polyethylene
Scientists tested four common methods for separating microplastics from seawater samples and found that each method recovered different amounts and types of particles. Standardizing separation methods is critical for making microplastic concentration data comparable across different studies.
Preservation, storage, and sample preparation methods for freshwater microplastics – a comprehensive review
This study evaluated how different preservation, storage, and pre-treatment methods affect microplastic detection accuracy in freshwater samples, identifying which approaches best maintain sample integrity. The findings provide practical guidance for standardizing pre-analysis workflows in freshwater microplastic research.