0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastics and nanoplastics in the air: a review

Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology/Science and Technology 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Van Nang Bui, Trung-Dung Nghiem, Thi Thu hien Nguyen

Summary

This review examines the occurrence, sources, physicochemical characteristics, and sampling and analytical methods for microplastics and nanoplastics in atmospheric air across urban, industrial, coastal, and remote environments. The authors find that fibers and fragments are the dominant atmospheric microplastic forms, that no standardized sampling methods currently exist, and that both passive and active collection approaches are used across the literature with limited comparability.

Given the increasing concern about microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) in the atmosphere, numerous studies have been conducted on their presence and impacts. This review explores the occurrence, sources, physicochemical characteristics, and the sampling and analytical methods of MPs and NPs in ambient air. MPs are primarily found in the form of fibers and fragments, with sizes generally exceeding several micrometers, and have been detected in various environments, including urban, industrial, coastal, and remote areas. Currently, there are no standardized methods for sampling and analyzing MPs and NPs in the atmosphere. Existing studies predominantly employ passive sampling methods to collect depositable microplastics and active sampling methods for suspended MPs. In the laboratory, most samples are treated with H2O2 and then separated by density before being analyzed using microscopy and spectroscopic techniques such as FT-IR and Raman. However, the current sampling and analytical methods have proven insufficient for detecting the presence of NPs in the air. Therefore, there is a need to develop new sampling and analytical methods to determine them in the atmospheric environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic in the Air

This review provides a comprehensive overview of methods for collecting, extracting, and identifying airborne microplastics, examining their sources, transport mechanisms, and persistence in urban and atmospheric environments, and establishing a methodological foundation for future research on microplastic air pollution.

Article Tier 2

Status and prospects of atmospheric microplastics: A review of methods, occurrence, composition, source and health risks

This review summarized the sampling methods, occurrence, composition, sources, and health risks of atmospheric microplastics. Researchers found that airborne microplastics are detected both indoors and outdoors, with fibers being the most common shape, and that inhalation represents an important but understudied exposure pathway. The study suggests that atmospheric transport plays a significant role in the global distribution of microplastic pollution.

Systematic Review Tier 1

A review of airborne micro- and nano-plastics: Sampling methods, analytical techniques, and exposure risks.

This review of 140 articles on airborne micro- and nanoplastics found that diverse sampling and analytical methods make cross-study comparisons difficult, limiting exposure risk assessment. The authors recommend standardization of methods and highlight that active samplers and FTIR/Raman spectroscopy are the most commonly used approaches for collecting and identifying atmospheric plastic particles.

Article Tier 2

Atmospheric microplastics: A review on current status and perspectives

This review summarizes current knowledge about microplastics detected in the atmosphere of urban, suburban, and remote areas around the world. Researchers found that airborne microplastic concentrations vary by one to three orders of magnitude across different locations, with fibers and fragments being the most common shapes. The study highlights the need for standardized sampling methods and further research to understand how atmospheric microplastics affect human health.

Article Tier 2

The Current Status of Atmospheric Micro/Nanoplastics Research: Characterization, Analytical Methods, Fate, and Human Health Risk

This review synthesizes current knowledge on atmospheric micro- and nanoplastics, covering their characterization, analytical methods, environmental fate, and human health risks while highlighting the need for standardized sampling protocols to enable cross-study comparisons.

Share this paper