0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Sign in to save

The quantification of the airborne plastic particles of 0.43–11 μm: Procedure development and application to atmospheric environment

Chemosphere 2024 37 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, T. Morioka, Shuhei Tanaka, T. Morioka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Akiko Kohama-Inoue, Akiko Kohama-Inoue, Akiko Kohama-Inoue, Akiko Kohama-Inoue, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Atsushi Watanabe Atsushi Watanabe Shuhei Tanaka, Atsushi Watanabe Atsushi Watanabe Atsushi Watanabe Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, Shuhei Tanaka, T. Morioka, Shuhei Tanaka, Atsushi Watanabe Atsushi Watanabe

Summary

Researchers developed a new method for measuring airborne plastic particles as small as 0.43 micrometers, a size range rarely studied before. Testing the approach in real atmospheric conditions, they detected multiple types of plastic polymers in the air, including polyethylene, polystyrene, and PET, providing evidence that people are regularly breathing in ultrafine plastic particles.

The environmental degradation of microplastics results in ultrafine particles that may incur severe biological concerns. Despite this, the atmospheric existence of plastics of less than a few microns has barely been investigated due to the particle size limit of conventional analytical methods. This study develops a procedure to quantify and characterize plastic particles (including nanoplastics; less than 1 μm) in the air through fractional sampling, a simple pretreatment method, and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (pyr-GC/MS). We targeted 11 major polymers, namely, polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resin, styrene-butadiene rubber, polymethylmethacrylate, polycarbonate, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide 6, and polyamide 66 (PA66). The average spike and recovery rate of each polymer in the aerosol collected on the roof of a four-story building near a major road in Kyoto, Japan, amounted to 78-130%, with a coefficient of variation of less than 15%. By coupling pyr-GC/MS analysis with fractional sampling of particles within the size range of >11 μm, 11-7.0 μm, 7.0-4.7 μm, 4.7-3.3 μm, 3.3-2.1 μm, 2.1-1.1 μm, 1.1-0.65 μm, 0.65-0.43 μm, it was possible to quantify airborne nano- and microplastics by particle size. Polyethylene, polystyrene, PET, and PA66 were detected in the air, and the total mass concentration of tiny plastic particles (0.43-11 μm) amounted to 1.20 μg/m. This translates into total particle numbers of 3.05 × 10 particles/m (assuming spheres), revealing a substantial number of particles under 1 μm. These results will contribute to future studies to understand the atmospheric behaviors of ultrafine plastic particles and their flow-on effects on the respiratory system.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper