We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A review on microplastics in major European rivers
Summary
This review summarizes existing research on microplastic contamination in six major European rivers, finding polystyrene, polypropylene, and polyethylene as the most common types. The researchers noted significant inconsistencies between studies due to different sampling and analysis methods, making it difficult to compare results or assess true contamination levels. Standardizing how scientists measure microplastics in rivers is essential for understanding the real scope of contamination in European freshwater supplies.
Abstract The topic of riverine microplastics is of great interest to the general public, yet the univocal scientific knowledge on this topic is limited. This review investigated the occurrence of microplastics in 6 major European rivers and their tributaries based on the results from 29 studies. We examined the reviewed studies in regard to data quality and reproducibility and assessed the abundance of microplastics in different sections of the water column. Furthermore, we investigated the chemical composition and potential origin of the reported riverine microplastics. We found that polystyrene, polypropylene, and polyethylene were the most abundant polymer types. The majority of primary microplastics arose from the industry sector as well as from personal care and cleaning products, whereas secondary microplastics constituted fibers from synthetic textiles and fragments of diverse origins. We highlighted the diversity of experimental and analytical approaches that could lead to high uncertainties in the measurements of microplastics abundance. Furthermore, the presence of microplastics in rivers was found to vary spatially likely due to point and nonpoint pollution sources of anthropogenic activities. Heterogenous environmental processes impacted the fate of microplastics characterized by various forms, sizes, and densities, in different ways. This impeded the identification of representative quantitative measurements of microplastics across different time frames. We advocate for the development of standardized protocols by the research community to ensure higher reproducibility of sampling, processing, and analysis of microplastics in aquatic environments. We recommend long‐term and site‐specific monitoring on microplastics with high data comparability to better inform policy making. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Water Quality Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics in Asian rivers: Geographical distribution, most detected types, and inconsistency in methodologies
A systematic review of 228 studies on microplastics in Asian rivers found polyethylene, polypropylene, and PET as the dominant polymers, primarily as fibers and fragments, with research concentrated in China and Japan. The diversity of sampling methods and reporting metrics across studies complicates comparative analysis, underscoring the need for standardized analytical frameworks in the region.
Microplastics in the riverine environment: Meta-analysis and quality criteria for developing robust field sampling procedures
This meta-analysis reviews how microplastics are sampled in rivers and finds that current methods are inconsistent, making it hard to compare results across studies. Better standardized sampling approaches are needed to accurately measure how much microplastic pollution flows through rivers that supply drinking water to communities.
Microplastic pollution in the German aquatic environment: Existence, interactions and research needs
This review examines microplastic pollution in German waterways and wastewater treatment plants, finding concentrations as high as 11,050 particles per liter in rivers. Fibers were the most common shape, and polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene were the dominant polymer types, mostly coming from municipal and industrial wastewater. The authors highlight that despite being Europe's largest economy, Germany has surprisingly limited research on this issue and call for standardized measurement methods.
Significant regional disparities in riverine microplastics
Researchers built a comprehensive framework to compare microplastic pollution across 76 rivers spanning Asia, Europe, and Africa, revealing significant regional differences. Rivers in Asia tended to have higher microplastic concentrations than those in Europe, and land use patterns strongly influenced contamination levels. The study highlights the need for standardized methods to enable meaningful global comparisons of riverine microplastic pollution.
Evaluation of riverine macro- and mesoplastic monitoring approaches.
This review evaluated and compared existing monitoring approaches for riverine macro- and mesoplastics, identifying key methodological inconsistencies that limit cross-study comparisons and calling for standardization to improve understanding of plastic transport and accumulation in freshwater river systems.