0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Unveiling the presence of micro and nanoplastics in human biological matrices: A systematic review covering the latest five years from 2020 to 2025

The Science of The Total Environment 2025 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 63 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marios C. Christodoulou, Antonis A. Zorpas, Marios C. Christodoulou, Irene Voukkali, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Marinos Stylianou, Marinos Stylianou, Antonis A. Zorpas, Irene Voukkali, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Irene Voukkali, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Vincenzo Naddeo, Antonis A. Zorpas, Vincenzo Naddeo Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Damia Barcello, Antonis A. Zorpas, Damia Barcello, Chrysostomos Kepertis, Chrysostomos Kepertis, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Antonis A. Zorpas, Vincenzo Naddeo Vincenzo Naddeo

Summary

This systematic review covering 2020-2025 confirmed the presence of micro- and nanoplastics in human blood, placenta, lungs, liver, kidneys, and other biological matrices. The findings demonstrate that plastic particles are accumulating in human tissues through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact, raising urgent questions about long-term health consequences.

Models
Study Type Review

Plastic contamination has emerged as one of the most pressing environmental challenges of the 21st century, with global plastic production surpassing 413 million metric tons in 2024. This dramatic increase has led to a parallel rise in the generation of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs), tiny plastic particles that now permeate not only natural ecosystems but also human environments. Human exposure to MNPs occurs through contaminated food, water, inhalation of airborne particles, dermal contact, and medical devices, although the exact exposure levels and health impacts remain uncertain. Once internalized, these particles have been shown to provoke inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune system disruption. To better understand the scope of this issue, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted on polymer types, particle sizes, detection methodologies, and documented biological impacts. MNPs were consistently identified across a wide range of human biological matrices, with the blood (30.2 %), stool (12.3 %), and skin (9.9 %) being among the most frequently studied. The most detected polymers included polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS). Recent advancements in detection technologies, particularly micro-Raman spectroscopy (μRaman), micro-Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (μFTIR), and pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS), have significantly enhanced analytical sensitivity, allowing for the reliable identification of particles as small as 1 μm. Without limitation the results from this systematic review are useful and applicable to guiding public health policies, shaping environmental regulations, and informing future toxicological research.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper