We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Impacts of pristine, aged and leachate of conventional and biodegradable plastics on plant growth and soil organic carbon
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional plastics (polyethylene, polypropylene) and biodegradable alternatives (polyhydroxybutyrate, polylactic acid) on ryegrass growth and soil health in both pristine and aged forms. They found that all plastic types, whether conventional or biodegradable, reduced plant biomass, lowered soil pH and organic matter, and increased CO2 respiration rates. The study provides evidence that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily safer for soil ecosystems than conventional plastics.
Abstract Plastic is an essential component of agriculture globally, becoming a concerning form of pollution. Biodegradable alternatives are gaining attention as a potential replacement for commonly used, non-degradable plastics, but there is little known about the impacts of biodegradable plastics as they age and potential leachates are released. In this study, different types (conventional: polyethylene and polypropylene and biodegradable: polyhydroxybutyrate and polylactic acid) of micro- and meso-films were added to soil at 0.1% (w/w) prior to being planted with Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass) to evaluate the plant and soil biophysical responses in a pot experiment. Root and shoot biomass and chlorophyll content were reduced when soil was exposed to plastics, whether conventional or biodegradable, pristine, aged or when just their leachate was present. The pH and organic matter content of soil exposed to these plastics and their leachates was significantly reduced compared to control samples; furthermore, there was an increase in CO 2 respiration rate from soil. In general, meso (> 5 mm) and micro (< 5 mm) plastic films did not differ in the impact on plants or soil. This study provides evidence that conventional and biodegradable plastics have both physical and chemical impacts on essential soil characteristics and the growth of L. perenne , potentially leading to wider effects on soil carbon cycling. Graphical abstract
More Papers Like This
An investigation into the mechanistic impacts of conventional and alternative plastics on plant growth and carbon dynamics.
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional polymers (polyethylene, polypropylene) and biodegradable alternatives (polyhydroxyalkanoate, polylactic acid) as microplastic films on ryegrass growth and soil health indicators. Most polymer treatments significantly reduced root biomass, chlorophyll content, and soil organic matter while increasing respiration rate, with biodegradable plastics sometimes causing greater decreases in organic matter, suggesting they carry comparable ecological risks.
Impacts of conventional and alternative plastics on soil ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This PhD research investigated how conventional and alternative (biodegradable, bio-based) plastics and their leachates affect soil health, plant performance, and soil organisms. While biodegradable plastics degraded faster, leachates from both conventional and alternative plastics caused similar levels of soil toxicity and plant stress in some conditions.
Effects of different microplastics on the physicochemical properties and microbial diversity of rice rhizosphere soil
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics, both fresh and aged, affect rice paddy soil properties and microbial communities. They found that aged microplastics had stronger effects than fresh ones, altering soil pH, nutrient availability, and the composition of root-associated bacteria. The study warns that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily safer for soil health than conventional plastics, especially as they break down over time.
Impacts of conventional and biodegradable microplastics in maize-soil ecosystems: Above and below ground
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional plastics (polyethylene and polypropylene) and biodegradable plastics (PBAT and PCL) on corn plants and soil health. One biodegradable plastic, PCL, reduced plant production by about 74% and severely disrupted soil enzyme activity and microbial communities. This study cautions that simply replacing conventional plastics with biodegradable alternatives in farming is not guaranteed to be safer for soil ecosystems.
Impacts of conventional and alternative plastics on soil ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This research tested whether biodegradable and bio-based plastics pose fewer ecological risks than conventional plastics in agricultural soils, finding that both types caused similar adverse effects on plant biomass, soil properties, and soil fauna. The results challenge the assumption that biodegradable alternatives are inherently safer and call for stricter regulatory evaluation.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.