We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Combined effects of heavy metals and microplastics on maize grown in acid and alkaline soils inoculated with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria
Summary
Researchers grew maize in soils contaminated with combinations of biodegradable (PLA) and conventional (LDPE) microplastics and heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Zn, Ni) in both acid and alkaline soils, with and without plant growth-promoting bacteria. The combined microplastic-heavy metal contamination reduced growth more than either stressor alone, while bacterial inoculants partially mitigated the damage in alkaline soils.
Microplastic particles (MPs) are recognized as novel pollutants, and their interactions with heavy metals (HMs) in soil can threaten ecosystem health and agricultural productivity. This study evaluates the combined effects of biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) and non-biodegradable low-density polyethylene (LDPE) MPs and HMs include lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), and nickel (Ni) on soil properties and maize growth. Maize was grown in alkaline (pH = 7.8) and acidic (pH = 5.6) soils under five MPs treatments (control, 1% LDPE, 5% LDPE, 1% PLA and 5% PLA) and Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) treatments including control, Pseudomonas fluorescens (P. fluorescens) and Azospirillum lipoferum (A. lipoferum) for 50 days. Results showed that PLA increased soil pH, while LDPE decreased it. Microplastic particles elevated electrical conductivity (EC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), with LDPE having a stronger effect on EC and PLA on DOC. LDPE enhanced HMs uptake in maize, whereas PLA decreased it. In alkaline soil, both MPs reduced plant biomass; however, reduction was not significant in PLA treatments. In contrast, in acidic soil, PLA increased shoot and root dry weights by 22.5% and 47.95%, respectively. The 5% LDPE treatment without bacteria caused the most significant reduction in shoot and root dry weights with decreases of 33.4% and 42.8% in alkaline soil; 26.8% and 21.1% in acidic soil respectively. PGPR increased soil DOC, improved plant growth, mitigated LDPE's negative effects, and amplified PLA's benefits. These findings highlight the importance of MP type, soil conditions, and PGPR for managing MPs-HMs contamination, with PLA and PGPR as sustainable agriculture strategies.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Interactions of microplastics and cadmium on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in an agricultural soil
Researchers studied how polyethylene and polylactic acid microplastics interact with cadmium contamination to affect maize growth and beneficial soil fungi in agricultural soil. While polyethylene showed minimal direct plant toxicity, high doses of polylactic acid significantly reduced maize biomass, and both plastic types altered the communities of root-associated fungi. The study suggests that co-contamination of microplastics and heavy metals in farmland can jointly disrupt plant health and soil ecosystems.
Influence of soil microplastic contamination on maize (Zea mays) development and microbial dynamics
Researchers grew maize (corn) in soil contaminated with varying amounts of microplastics and found that higher microplastic levels disrupted soil bacteria and fungi, caused leaf damage like yellowing and tissue death, and led to elevated heavy metals in plant tissue above safe limits. The results point to serious risks microplastics pose to crop health, soil ecosystems, and food safety.
Beneficial microbial consortia effectively alleviated plant stress caused by the synergistic toxicity of microplastics and cadmium
Researchers found that combined pollution from microplastics (PVC) and the heavy metal cadmium creates a toxic effect in soil that is worse than either pollutant alone. However, applying beneficial bacteria to contaminated soil helped plants grow better and restored soil nutrients. These findings suggest that probiotic-like bacteria could help repair farmland damaged by microplastic and heavy metal pollution.
Effects of combined microplastics and heavy metals pollution on terrestrial plants and rhizosphere environment: A review
This review summarizes how microplastics and heavy metals interact in soil to affect plant growth and the surrounding ecosystem. When present together, these pollutants cause significantly more harm than either alone, reducing plant weight by up to 87.5% and altering how heavy metals accumulate in crops -- raising concerns about food safety and human exposure through contaminated agricultural products.
Effects of microplastics and cadmium co-contamination on soil properties, maize (Zea mays L.) growth characteristics, and cadmium accumulation in maize in loessial soil-maize systems
Researchers studied the combined effects of polyethylene microplastics and cadmium on soil properties and maize growth through pot experiments. They found that microplastics altered soil nutrient availability and, depending on size and concentration, either increased or decreased cadmium uptake by the plants. The study suggests that microplastic contamination in agricultural soils can change how crops absorb toxic heavy metals, with potential implications for food safety.