0
Article Tier 2 Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

An investigation into the stability and degradation of plastics in aquatic environments using a large-scale field-deployment study

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 11 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists deployed five types of plastic at marine sites and a wastewater treatment plant in New Zealand for up to 12 months to study how they break down in real conditions. The plastics degraded much more slowly in the natural environment than under artificial UV exposure in the lab, with most showing only minor surface changes. This means lab studies may overestimate how quickly plastics fragment into microplastics, and the long persistence of intact plastics in nature presents an ongoing pollution challenge.

Study Type Environmental

The fragmentation of plastic debris is a key pathway to the formation of microplastic pollution. These disintegration processes depend on the materials' physical and chemical characteristics, but insight into these interrelationships is still limited, especially under natural conditions. Five plastics of known polymer/additive compositions and processing histories were deployed in aquatic environments and recovered after six and twelve months. The polymer types used were linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), oxo-degradable LLDPE (oxoLLDPE), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyamide-6 (PA6), and poly(lactic acid) (PLA). Four geographically distinct locations across Aotearoa/New Zealand were chosen: three marine sites and a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Accelerated UV-weathering under controlled laboratory conditions was also carried out to evaluate artificial ageing as a model for plastic degradation in the natural environment. The samples' physical characteristics and surface microstructures were studied for each deployment location and exposure time. The strongest effects were found for oxoLLDPE upon artificial ageing, with increased crystallinity, intense surface cracking, and substantial deterioration of its mechanical properties. However, no changes to the same extent were found after recovery of the deployed material. In the deployment environments, the chemical nature of the plastics was the most relevant factor determining their behaviours. Few significant differences between the four aquatic locations were identified, except for PA6, where indications for biological surface degradation were found only in seawater, not the WWTP. In some cases, artificial ageing reasonably mimicked the changes which some plastic properties underwent in aquatic environments, but generally, it was no reliable model for natural degradation processes. The findings from this study have implications for the understanding of the initial phases of plastic degradation in aquatic environments, eventually leading to microplastics formation. They can also guide the interpretation of accelerated laboratory ageing for the fate of aquatic plastic pollution, and for the testing of aged plastic samples.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Quantitative study of microplastic degradation in urban hydrosystems: Comparing in situ environmentally aged microplastics vs. artificially aged materials generated via accelerated photo-oxidation

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared how polyethylene microplastics degrade in real urban water environments versus under controlled laboratory UV exposure. They found that lab-aged plastics showed primarily physical and chemical changes from UV light, while microplastics collected from stormwater and sediments also showed signs of biological degradation and hydrolysis. The study demonstrates that artificial aging alone does not fully replicate the complex degradation processes microplastics undergo in actual urban water systems.

Article Tier 2

An In Situ Experiment to Evaluate the Aging and Degradation Phenomena Induced by Marine Environment Conditions on Commercial Plastic Granules

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers designed two experimental setups to monitor the aging and degradation of commercial plastic granules (HDPE, PP, PLA, and PBAT) in marine conditions over three years. The first six months of results showed measurable changes in plastic properties from exposure to seawater and beach conditions. The study provides real-world data on how different plastic types degrade in marine environments, with biodegradable plastics showing faster changes than conventional polymers.

Article Tier 2

An advanced analytical approach to assess the long-term degradation of microplastics in the marine environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed several types of plastic pellets to realistic ocean conditions over time and found that marine weathering caused much faster surface degradation than previously estimated — up to 469 micrometers per year, twelve times higher than older figures — while also generating secondary micro- and nanoplastic particles smaller than one micron. The results provide critical real-world data for assessing how quickly ocean plastics break down into even tinier, harder-to-detect fragments.

Article Tier 2

The effect of biodegradable plastics on microplastic accumulation and exposure

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers developed a comprehensive method to quantify microplastic accumulation from biodegradable polymers in natural environments, examining whether biodegradable alternatives actually reduce plastic loads compared to conventional polymers under real-world outdoor conditions.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics: Degradation properties of polymers in the environment

AI summary Read the abstract

This study examined the degradation pathways and rates of various plastic polymers in environmental settings, addressing the gap between labeled biodegradability and actual environmental persistence. Understanding how different plastics fragment and degrade is essential for predicting their long-term fate as microplastics in soil and aquatic environments.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper