0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Comparison of Plastic Waste Processing Machine Models in The Producing of Plastic Grains and Oil Fuel and Its Cost Analysis

Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan 2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sri Puji Ganefati, Iswanto Iswanto, Bambang Suwerda, Sugianto Sugianto, Sarjito Eko Windarso

Summary

Researchers compared three plastic waste processing machine models with one, two, and three distillation chambers, evaluating their production of plastic pellets and fuel oil through heating and distillation, and conducted break-even point analysis to assess economic viability.

Alat pengolah sampah plastik melalui proses pemanasan dan destilasi dapat menghasilkan butir plastik dan bahan bakar minyak sebagai alternatif solusi lain untuk masalah sampah plastik. Pengujian kinerja dari 3 (tiga) buah model mesin pengolah sampah plastik (model I, II, and III) yang masing-masing dilengkapi dengan satu, dua, dan tiga tabung distilasi, dilakukan untuk membandingkan hasil produksi butir plastik dan bahan bakar minyak yang dapat dihasilkan. Selanjutnya, biaya ekonomiannya dianalisis menggunakan besaran nilai titik impas (break even point). Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa Model I menghasilkan butir plastik tertinggi, yaitu sebesar 2,76 kg dan Model III menghasilkan bahan bakar minyak tertinggi, yaitu sebesar 51 mL. Hasil uji statistik diperoleh bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara Model I, II, dan III terhadap kuantitas butir plastik dan bahan bakar minyak dengan hasil (p>α; (1,000 > 0,05). Hasil analisis keekonomian menunjukkan bahwa titik impas (break even point) dari masing-masing model (I, II dan III) akan tercapai dalam waktu 44,47 dan 35 hari dengan waktu operasi selama 8 jam per hari dan 10,5 kg/hari sampah plastik. Secara ekonomi, model III menunjukkan pengembalian investasi yang relatif lebih cepat dibandingkan model I dan II. Hasil penelitian ini bermanfaat bagi pengembangan perancangan mesin pengolah sampah plastik untuk skala yang lebih besar di industri. Selain itu, diharapkan juga dapat memberikan nilai tambah ekonomi masyarakat dan alternatif solusi bagi permasalahan sampah plastik di Indonesia. Abstract A plastic waste processing apparatus, employing heating and distillation processes can yield plastic grains and oil fuel, providing an alternative solution to the plastic waste problem. Performance tests were conducted on 3 (three) models of plastic waste processing machines (Models I, II, and III) equipped with one, two, and three distillation cylinders, respectively, to compare the quantity of plastic grains and oil fuel produced. Furthermore, an economic cost analysis was also conducted by using the break even point as a metric. The results showed that Model I yielded the highest quantity of plastic grains (2.76 kg), and Model III produced the highest amount of oil fuel (51 mL). Statistical tests indicated no significant differences (p>α; 1.000 > 0.05) among Models I, II, and III concerning the quantities of plastic pellets and oil fuel. Economic analysis demonstrated that the break-even points for each model (I, II, and III) would be attained in 44, 47, and 35 days, respectively, assuming an 8-hour daily operation and processing 10.5 kg/day of plastic waste. Model III economically showed a relatively more cost-effective compared to Models I and II. The findings of this research can be applied to the development of mass-production of plastic grains and oil fuel from plastic waste on an industrial scale. This research could be contributed to the increas in community economic value and offer an alternative solution to the plastic waste issue in Indonesia.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Techno-Economic Review of Pyrolysis and Gasification Plants for Thermochemical Recovery of Plastic Waste and Economic Viability Assessment of Small-Scale Implementation

This review evaluates the technical and economic viability of pyrolysis and gasification for converting plastic waste into fuel, finding that small-scale implementation faces significant cost challenges. Converting plastic waste into fuel reduces the amount available to degrade into microplastics in the environment, but economic barriers limit widespread adoption.

Article Tier 2

Harnessing Pyrolysis for Industrial Energy Autonomy and Sustainable Waste Management

Researchers designed a small-scale pyrolysis system that converts plastic waste into synthetic oil for industrial energy generation. The proposed unit processes 360 tons of plastic waste yearly to produce fuel capable of generating 500 MWh of electricity, with a total investment cost of approximately EUR 41,000 and potential annual revenue of up to EUR 45,000.

Article Tier 2

Economic feasibility of catalytic cracking of polymer waste for fuel production

This study analyzed the economic feasibility of catalytic cracking of polyethylene and polypropylene plastic waste to produce liquid fuel, finding that the process can be cost-competitive under certain conditions. Converting plastic waste into fuel reduces the amount that degrades into microplastics in the environment while generating economic value.

Article Tier 2

Optimization of Renewable Energy Supply Chain for Sustainable Hydrogen Energy Production from Plastic Waste

Researchers developed an optimization model for producing hydrogen energy from plastic waste in Iran using a renewable energy supply chain approach. They found that converting plastic waste into hydrogen fuel through gasification is economically feasible, with costs potentially decreasing over time as the system scales. The study presents a strategy for simultaneously reducing plastic waste volume and generating clean energy.

Article Tier 2

Analysis of Plastic Waste Processing Methods

This review summarizes global plastic waste production and recycling trends, arguing that the recycling industry must scale up urgently to address growing environmental contamination. Current recycling rates remain far below what is needed to prevent plastic pollution from continuing to accumulate.

Share this paper