We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Techno-Economic Review of Pyrolysis and Gasification Plants for Thermochemical Recovery of Plastic Waste and Economic Viability Assessment of Small-Scale Implementation
Summary
This review evaluates the technical and economic viability of pyrolysis and gasification for converting plastic waste into fuel, finding that small-scale implementation faces significant cost challenges. Converting plastic waste into fuel reduces the amount available to degrade into microplastics in the environment, but economic barriers limit widespread adoption.
Abstract Polymers used in the production of consumer products become a part of municipal waste streams after reaching the end of their useful lifespan, but also before even reaching markets, as rejects, scraps, and/or industry by-products as a part of industrial waste streams. Suitability for recovery of industrial wastes differs significantly and needs to be analyzed separately. In this research, a review of the techno-economic parameters of existing recovery plants is done. Dependences between economic and technological parameters, sizes, and types of plants, as well as the composition of input material, are derived. Based on the presented data, a techno-economic analysis of the small-scale implementation of thermochemical recovery plants, for industry-generated residual plastic waste fraction, is conducted. Results show that thermochemical conversion of industrial plastic waste cannot be economically viable on a small scale without a gate-fee. Pyrolysis plants brake even gate-fee is on the level of over 50/86 €/t, while treating only 51%/28% of residual waste, due to strict restrictions regarding feedstock composition. In the case of gasification, it is on the level of 70 €/t, while treating 92% of available waste. Pyrolysis is the only viable solution for treating up to 12 TPD after which gasification also becomes a viable option. Usual capacities are up to 25/100 TPD for pyrolysis/gasification, after which incineration-based technologies need to be considered. The presented results provide decision-makers with a good overview of alternative thermochemical conversion technologies, their technical characteristics, limitations, and possible economic outcomes of their implementation.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Economic feasibility of catalytic cracking of polymer waste for fuel production
This study analyzed the economic feasibility of catalytic cracking of polyethylene and polypropylene plastic waste to produce liquid fuel, finding that the process can be cost-competitive under certain conditions. Converting plastic waste into fuel reduces the amount that degrades into microplastics in the environment while generating economic value.
Perspectives on Thermochemical Recycling of End-of-Life Plastic Wastes to Alternative Fuels
This review examined thermochemical recycling technologies including pyrolysis, liquefaction, and gasification for converting plastic waste into clean fuels, discussing operating principles, barriers, and the potential for co-processing plastics with biomass.
Microplastic Recovery and Conversion Pathways: The Most Recent Advancements in Technologies for the Generation of Renewable Energy
This review examines current technologies for recovering energy from microplastics, evaluating pyrolysis, gasification, electrochemical methods, and hybrid biomass-based approaches in terms of energy balance, carbon conversion, product composition, process efficiency, and scalability. The authors found pyrolysis to be the most scalable method, producing valuable oils and gases, but highlighted that all reviewed technologies face challenges handling the heterogeneous composition and small particle sizes characteristic of MP feedstocks.
Reimagining plastics waste as energy solutions: challenges and opportunities
This review examines the potential of converting plastic waste into energy through waste-to-energy and waste-to-fuel technologies, particularly in developing nations where recycling infrastructure is limited. Researchers assessed various conversion methods including pyrolysis and gasification, evaluating their efficiency and environmental trade-offs. The study emphasizes that energy recovery from plastic waste could help address both the growing plastic pollution crisis and energy needs in underserved regions.
Materials challenges and opportunities to address growing micro/nanoplastics pollution: a review of thermochemical upcycling
This review examined thermochemical upcycling technologies including pyrolysis, gasification, and liquefaction as approaches to valorize micro- and nanoplastic waste, assessing the material challenges and opportunities for converting environmental plastic pollution into useful fuels or chemical feedstocks.