0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Sewage Derived Microplastic and Anthropogenic Fibre Retention by Integrated Constructed Wetlands

2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Richard J. Warren, Richard Cooper, Andrew R. Mayes, Stefanie Nolte, Kevin M. Hiscock, Jonah Tosney

Summary

Researchers assessed microplastic and anthropogenic fibre retention efficiency of two integrated constructed wetlands in Norfolk, UK, collecting monthly water samples at inlets and outlets over 12 months to evaluate whether these low-cost treatment systems can effectively reduce MP loads discharged from small wastewater treatment plants.

Study Type Environmental

High loads of microplastics and anthropogenic fibres can be discharged from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) into surface water bodies. Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICWs) are potentially well suited to provide a cost-effective mitigation solution at small WWTPs where conventional treatment is prohibitively expensive. ICWs consist of a series of connected ponds (receiving all of their inflow from WWTP effluent) that are planted with diverse native vegetation, and are thus designed to improve downstream water quality. This study aimed to assess the microplastic and anthropogenic fibre retention efficiency of two ICWs (Northrepps and Ingoldisthorpe) in Norfolk (UK) over a 12-month period. Water samples were collected at approximately monthly intervals from the inlet and outlet of each wetland (n = 54) between June 2022 and May 2023, and fine bed sediment samples were collected from the Northrepps ICW (n = 23). Northrepps ICW received on average 351,588 (± 223,986) anthropogenic fibres day-1, with a retention rate of 99.3 %. No seasonal variation was observed in retention efficiency. Ingoldisthorpe ICW intermittently received anthropogenic fibres in low concentrations, with an average of 11,448 (± 518) day-1 and a retention rate of 100 %. Microplastics and anthropogenic fibres were prevalent in sediment samples of the first cell of Northrepps ICW, averaging 10,090 items kg-1 dry sediment, while none were found at concentrations above the limit of detection in the second or third cell. Of the 369 fibres analysed by ATR-FTIR, 55 % were plastic (dominated by polyester). Of the 140 suspected microplastic fragments analysed by ATR-FTIR, 73 % were confidently identified as plastic (mostly polystyrene, polyethylene, or polypropylene). This study demonstrates how ICWs can effectively retain sewage effluent derived microplastics and anthropogenic fibres. However, the accumulation of plastic waste in ICWs may complicate long term management and their cost-effectiveness. Research into the minimum size of the first cell to ensure that microplastics are retained within a small area of the overall wetland is recommended to improve long term management prospects.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Sewage Derived Microplastic and Anthropogenic Fibre Retention by Integrated Constructed Wetlands

Integrated constructed wetlands were evaluated as a low-cost treatment option for capturing microplastics and anthropogenic fibers from small wastewater treatment plant effluents, offering a promising mitigation strategy where conventional treatment is too expensive.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics profile in constructed wetlands: Distribution, retention and implications

This study assessed microplastic distribution, retention, and implications within constructed wetlands used for wastewater treatment, finding that wetlands trap substantial quantities of MPs but that retention efficiency varies by plant species and wetland design. The results suggest constructed wetlands both remove and potentially accumulate MPs as a secondary pollution source.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics occurrence and fate in full-scale treatment wetlands

Researchers assessed microplastic occurrence and fate across full-scale treatment wetlands, finding that constructed wetlands effectively remove a significant proportion of MPs from wastewater but that removal efficiency varies with wetland design and MP characteristics.

Article Tier 2

Retention of microplastics by interspersed lagoons in both natural and constructed wetlands

Researchers used laboratory wetland models to test how well constructed wetlands with interspersed lagoons and aquatic vegetation can capture microplastic particles from water. Combining vegetated patches with a lagoon achieved microplastic retention rates of up to 99%, suggesting that nature-based wetland designs could be an effective low-cost strategy for filtering microplastics out of wastewater and rivers before they reach the ocean.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic Identification in Domestic Wastewater-Treating Constructed Wetlands and Its Potential Usage in a Circular Economy

Researchers identified and characterized microplastics in constructed wetlands used for treating domestic wastewater, finding MP accumulation in the substrate and plants and assessing how well these nature-based treatment systems retain plastic particles before effluent is discharged.

Share this paper