0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Implementation Of Regulation Number 02 Of 2011 Concerning Waste Management In Bengkulu City

Journal of Comprehensive Science (JCS) 2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yuri Fernando, Achmad Aminudin, Nour Farozi Agus

Summary

Researchers examined the implementation of Bengkulu City Regional Regulation Number 02 of 2011 on waste management using a qualitative approach, evaluating policy socialization, institutional capacity, and community compliance. They found that uneven socialization of waste management regulations and insufficient prioritization of the waste sector in urban development planning undermined effective implementation.

Other waste management issues stem from the lack of a professional waste management system planning. The waste management sector has not yet received priority compared to other sectors in urban development. This research utilizes a qualitative approach. In this study, to determine the implementation of the Bengkulu City Regional Regulation Number 02 of 2011 Regarding Waste Management in Bengkulu City based on the opinions expressed by Nugroho and the modified results between the Bengkulu City Regional Regulation Number 02 of 2011 Regarding Waste Management. Regarding the policy socialization aspect, it is noted that the socialization of regional regulations to the community is still uneven. Furthermore, for the socialization related to waste separation, similar responses were received. This is proven by organic waste still being seen in inorganic waste bins. In terms of planning, the provision of waste bins in public and social facilities is still unavailable in some facilities. Furthermore, regarding waste management financing, there are various tariff rates. For waste management conducted by LPM or third parties, the tariff is determined through mutual agreement. Meanwhile, waste management by the Department will be subject to agreed-upon fees. In terms of implementation, for supervision and oversight, researchers can conclude that the people of Bengkulu City feel the supervision being carried out. In terms of evaluation, the application of sanctions and criminal provisions received various responses. Some members of the community disagree with the rules, while others agree, in order to instill a deterrent effect and raise awareness to dispose of waste properly. Furthermore, waste management by LPM and the Department can be concluded to still not be fully operational, as evidenced by increasing piles of waste before the transportation process.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Level of Community Participation in 3R Based Household Waste Management in North Banjarmasin District

Researchers assessed community participation levels in 3R-based household waste management across 378 households in North Banjarmasin District, Banjarmasin, Indonesia, using descriptive quantitative methods. Results showed participation was categorized as very low, attributed largely to communities being excluded from program planning and evaluation and to uneven geographic implementation of waste management programs.

Article Tier 2

Study of Household Scale Waste Management in Batu City, Indonesia(Implementation of Batu Mayor's Regulation on Household Waste Management Policy)

This study evaluated household waste management policy implementation in Batu City, Indonesia, finding gaps between policy goals and actual household practices. Effective household-level waste management is essential for reducing environmental pollution, including plastic waste that contributes to microplastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

Enhancing Sustainability Development for Waste Management through National–Local Policy Dynamics

This study analyzed waste management policy coherence across national and local government levels in Indonesia, finding significant gaps in implementation that undermine sustainable development goals and allow plastic pollution from poor waste management practices to persist.

Article Tier 2

The STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PUBLIK PEMKOT BANDUNG DALAM PENGURANGAN KANTONG PLASTIK

This Indonesian study examined the public communication strategy used by the Bandung city government to reduce plastic bag use. Researchers found that combining regulatory messaging with community engagement improved awareness but faced compliance challenges. The study offers lessons for local governments implementing plastic reduction campaigns.

Article Tier 2

Construction of a plastic waste management policy model in the coastal city of Padang

Researchers evaluated plastic waste management policies in the coastal city of Padang, Indonesia, using descriptive interviews with stakeholders across relevant government agencies, finding that existing policies focus exclusively on land-based household waste and lack specific provisions for coastal plastic management. They found that the only applicable national regulation (Presidential Regulation No. 83 of 2018 on Marine Waste Management) has not been effectively implemented in coastal cities like Padang.

Share this paper