0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Establishing a Microfiber Recovery Rate in Human Lung Tissue

Microplastics 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kylie Babin-Howard, Kara Coffman-Rea, Karen E. Samonds

Summary

Scientists tested how well they can find tiny plastic fibers in human lung tissue, discovering they only recover about half of some types of fibers during lab testing. This means previous studies may have missed many plastic fibers in our lungs, so we might actually have more of these potentially harmful particles in our bodies than we thought. Getting better at detecting these fibers is important for understanding whether they pose real health risks to people.

Body Systems

Microplastics (<5 mm) are an increasing concern for environmental and human health, continuously detected in ecosystems worldwide and a variety of human tissues. While health effects remain unclear, experimental studies on microplastic particles have suggested adverse outcomes. Microplastic fibers, which shed from everyday items, are more toxic than particles and twice as prevalent, yet remain understudied. Microplastic studies vary widely and use various extraction techniques, with few validating recovery accuracy. These limited recovery studies primarily examine particles, raising concerns about the true abundance of microfibers. This study establishes baseline recovery rates of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) microfibers of varying lengths from formalin-fixed human cadaveric lung tissue. Following enzymatic and oxidative digestion, PET microfibers showed a recovery rate of 47%, while 87% of PP microfibers was recovered. Chemical alterations were assessed using laser direct infrared (LDIR) spectroscopy; optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluated physical changes post-digestion. These findings provide insights into microfiber recovery, highlight potential over- and underestimations, and characterize the chemical and physical behavior of fibers within human tissue studies. Establishing accurate recovery methods is essential for advancing microfiber toxicology research and assessing potential health risks.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Presence of airborne microplastics in human lung tissue

Researchers examined human lung tissue from autopsies and found microplastic particles and fibers in 13 out of 20 samples. The most common plastics were polyethylene and polypropylene, with particles smaller than 5.5 micrometers. This study provides direct evidence that inhaled microplastics accumulate in human lungs, raising concerns about potential long-term effects on respiratory health.

Article Tier 2

Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using μFTIR spectroscopy

Researchers analyzed lung tissue from 13 people and found microplastics in 11 of the samples, identifying 12 different plastic types including polypropylene and polyester. The particles were found in all regions of the lungs, with significantly higher concentrations in the lower lung. This is one of the first studies to directly confirm that microplastics from everyday environments can be inhaled and accumulate deep in human lung tissue.

Article Tier 2

First evidence of microplastics isolated in European citizens’ lower airway

Researchers provided the first evidence of microplastics in the lower airways of living European adults, using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from 44 patients. Nearly all detected particles were microfibers averaging about 1.7 millimeters in length, with an average concentration of roughly 9 items per 100 milliliters of fluid. The findings confirm that microplastics reach deep into the human respiratory system, though the health implications require further investigation.

Article Tier 2

Detection and Analysis of Microplastics in Human Sputum

Researchers analyzed sputum (mucus from the lungs) from 22 patients with respiratory diseases and found microplastics in every single sample, identifying 21 different plastic types. Polyurethane was the most common type detected, and most particles were smaller than 500 micrometers. This study provides direct evidence that humans are inhaling microplastics, with factors like smoking and medical procedures increasing the amount found in the respiratory tract.

Article Tier 2

Lung organoids and microplastic fibers: a new exposure model for emerging contaminants

Researchers developed a three-dimensional lung organoid model to study how inhaled microplastic fibers from synthetic clothing affect human lung tissue. The model showed that microplastic fibers triggered an inflammatory response in lung cells, providing a realistic laboratory system for assessing the respiratory health risks of airborne plastic pollution.

Share this paper