We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The fate of plastic wraps in constructed wetland: Surface structure and microbial community
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers buried four types of common plastic kitchen wrap — PE, PVC, PVDC, and PLA — in constructed wetlands and tracked how they degraded and what microbes colonized them over time. All plastics degraded and shed microplastics, with plant roots showing the most microbial diversity. PLA degraded fastest, while PVC and PVDC restricted microbial colonization due to their chlorine content, and the findings help clarify how agricultural and household plastic wraps contribute to microplastic contamination in wetland ecosystems.
The high use of plastic wraps leads to significant environmental pollution. In this study, the surface structure and microbial community evolution of commercially available plastic wraps [polyethylene (PE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), and polylactic acid (PLA)] in constructed wetlands (CWs) were investigated. The results indicated that all plastic wraps gradually decreased in molecular weight, crystallinity, melting, and crystallization temperatures, whereas a gradual increase was observed in the surface roughness, polymer dispersity index (PDI), carbonyl index (CI) and Shannon index of microorganisms colonizing the CWs. The aging rate of the plastic wrap was in the order: PLA > PVC > PE > PVDC, at the same site in the CWs, and it was in the order: soil surface > plant roots > subsoil, for the same plastic wrap. The diversity of microorganisms colonizing the same plastic wrap was in the order: plant roots > subsoil > soil surface. The Shannon indices of microorganisms on plastic wraps were lower than those in the soil, indicating that the diversity of microorganisms colonizing plastic wraps is limited. Additionally, the microbial community structure on the plastic surface was co-differentiated by the plastic type, placement position in the CWs, and aging time. Significantly different microbial community structures were found on the PVC and PVDC wrap surfaces, revealing that the chlorine in plastics limits microbial diversity. Unclassified members of Rhizobiaceae and Pseudomonadaceae were the dominant genera on the surface of the plastic wraps, suggesting that they may be the microorganisms involved in plastic degradation processes. The study provides valuable perspectives to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the migration, fate, and environmental risks associated with microplastics (MPs) in wetlands.
More Papers Like This
Characteristics analysis of plastisphere biofilm and effect of aging products on nitrogen metabolizing flora in microcosm wetlands experiment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers placed three types of plastic in miniature constructed wetlands for 180 days and tracked how they aged and affected microbial communities. The plastics degraded at different rates, with PVC developing new chemical groups and all surfaces becoming less water-repellent as bacteria colonized them. The plastic surfaces altered nitrogen-processing bacteria in the wetland water, suggesting microplastics can disrupt nutrient cycling in natural wetland ecosystems.
Aging of Microplastics across a Constructed Wetland
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the weathering and microbial colonization of five microplastic polymer types over 18 months within four habitat zones of a constructed wastewater wetland, finding that microorganisms colonized plastics rapidly and that weathering rates varied by polymer type and habitat.
Aging of Microplasticsacross a Constructed Wetland
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked the aging of five microplastic polymer types — LDPE, HDPE, polypropylene, polystyrene, and PET — across four habitats within a wastewater constructed wetland over 18 months, finding that physical, chemical, and biological processes jointly drive weathering and microorganism colonisation of plastics in these treatment systems.
Polymer–environment interplay drives microplastic degradation in a surface-flow wetland: New insights into bacterial assembly, network structure, and function across aquatic and sedimentary habitats
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested how well five common plastics break down in wetland environments over four months, finding that surprisingly, some plastic-based materials (like polyurethane) degraded faster than "eco-friendly" bioplastics like PLA, while polypropylene barely broke down at all. The real drivers of breakdown were bacteria living on the plastic surfaces, and their activity depended more on their surroundings—water versus sediment—than on the type of plastic itself. This matters because wetlands are often used to filter water, and understanding which plastics linger longest helps identify which microplastics may accumulate in ecosystems and, eventually,
Microplastic residues in wetland ecosystems: Do they truly threaten the plant-microbe-soil system?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used a controlled pot experiment to assess microplastic effects on wetland plant growth, soil microbial communities, and nutrient cycling, finding that MPs altered soil enzyme activity and shifted bacterial community composition but had variable effects on plant growth depending on plastic type.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.