0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

Comparative evaluation of molecular mechanisms triggered by differently functionalized polystyrene nanoplastics in human colon cell lines

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024 Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Liu, Xueyan, Wang, Junbiao, Xiao, Siyao, Digiacomo, Luca, Caracciolo, Giulio, Pozzi, Daniela, Borghi, Alessandra, Miceli, Cristina, Marchini, Cristina

Summary

Researchers compared molecular and cellular mechanisms triggered by differently surface-functionalized micro- and nanoplastics in human intestinal and liver cells, finding that surface chemistry strongly determines biological effects. Functionalized particles elicited distinct patterns of oxidative stress, inflammation, and membrane damage compared to unfunctionalized particles.

Polymers
Body Systems

The plastic waste can be progressive disintegrated into microscale (MPs; 1 µm-5 mm) and nanoscale particles (NPs; 1 nm-1 µm) through the long-term influence of mechanical forces of water, ultraviolet radiation, and biological degradation. Humans are mainly exposed to MPs and NPs through oral intake. Following their ingestion, particles can penetrate intestinal mucus, be transported to reach the circulatory system, and deposit in various organs, posing a serious risk to health. Polystyrene (PS) is an important thermoplastic found in disposable drinking cups, packaging, and personal care products. In the present study, unmodified PS or differently functionalized NPs (PS-COOH and PS-NH2; 100 nm in size) were selected as experimental models and administered to colorectal adenocarcinoma (Caco-2 and HT-29) and normal colon (CCD-841) cell lines, representing the cells potentially most exposed to microplastics. A comparison of internalization process into cells among differently functionalized NPs was performed by confocal microscopy and cytofluorimetric analysis. Fluorescent PS-COOH and PS-NH2 NPs were detected inside the cells after 2 hour-incubation, and they continued to accumulate within 24 hours. The impact of PS, PS-COOH and PS-NH2 (from 1 to 100 µg/mL) on Caco-2 and CCD-841 cell viability was evaluated after 48 hour- and 96 hour-incubation period by MTT assay: PS-NH2 significantly reduced cell viability in a dose and time-dependent way, while treatments with PS and PS-COOH were well tolerated and only the highest concentrations of PS-COOH were able to decrease cell viability after 96 hours. Western blot analysis revealed an inhibition of MAPK/ERK pathway, one of the main signaling cascades sustaining cell proliferation, by NPs treatment. Similar results were obtained on breast cancer cells, where the effect of protein corona on NPs toxicity was also evaluated. A transcriptome analysis will shed light on molecular mechanisms involved in the cell response to NPs. Funded by "Next Generation EU". Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559557/document

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Comparative evaluation of molecular mechanisms triggered by differently functionalized polystyrene nanoplastics in human colon cell lines

Researchers compared molecular mechanisms triggered by differently functionalized micro- and nanoplastics in human cells, assessing how surface chemistry affects cellular responses. Surface functionalization significantly altered the toxicity profile of particles, with some coatings increasing and others decreasing inflammatory and oxidative responses.

Article Tier 2

Comparative evaluation of molecular mechanisms triggered by differently functionalized polystyrene nanoplastics in human colon cell lines

Researchers compared the molecular mechanisms triggered by polystyrene nanoplastics with different surface functionalization in human colon cell lines. The study examined how surface chemistry of nanoplastic particles influences their biological interactions with intestinal cells, contributing to understanding of how nanoplastics may affect the human gastrointestinal system.

Article Tier 2

Comparative evaluation of molecular mechanisms triggered by differently functionalized polystyrene nanoplastics in human colon cell lines

Researchers compared the molecular responses triggered by polystyrene nanoplastics with different surface chemical groups in human colon cell lines. The study investigated how the specific functionalization of nanoplastic surfaces influences the cellular and molecular pathways activated upon exposure in human intestinal tissue.

Article Tier 2

Functionalized polystyrene nanoplastics induce distinct toxicity and transcriptomic changes in human intestinal Caco-2 cells

Researchers exposed human intestinal Caco-2 cells to polystyrene nanoplastics with different surface functionalizations (plain, aminated, carboxylated) and assessed cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and transcriptomic responses. Surface chemistry strongly determined both uptake efficiency and the pattern of gene expression changes, with aminated particles inducing the most severe cytotoxic and inflammatory responses.

Article Tier 2

Effects of polystyrene micro/nanoplastics on liver cells based on particle size, surface functionalization, concentration and exposure period

Researchers systematically studied the effects of polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics on human liver cells, varying particle size, surface chemistry, concentration, and exposure duration. They found that smaller particles were internalized more readily and that surface functionalization significantly influenced toxicity, with aminated particles causing the most cell damage. The study suggests that particle characteristics beyond just size play an important role in determining how micro- and nanoplastics affect human cells.

Share this paper