0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

The production and characterisation of nanoplastic reference material: optimization and method development

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Symiah Barnett, Symiah Barnett, Shadi Soheilian, Edwin Baynes, Eugénie Hunsicker, Eric Hill, Paul Roach, Paul Roach

Summary

Researchers optimized non-solvent phase separation methods using xylene, toluene, and phenol as solvents to produce nanoplastic reference materials from polyethylene, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene — polymer types more environmentally representative than commonly used commercial polystyrene nanoparticles. They characterized the produced particles by dynamic light scattering, scanning electron microscopy, FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy, finding predominantly irregular fragment morphologies that more closely resemble environmentally occurring nanoplastics.

There is a paucity of comparable data on plastic particle pollution in the scientific literature, driven by a lack of standardisation, insufficient quality controls, and inappropriate reference materials. Most studies on nanoplastics have been based on commercially available polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles. However, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are some of the most predominant plastics found in the environment. Therefore, it is important to use these polymer types as reference materials, since the optimal reference material used in environmental monitoring should resemble the plastic particles observed in nature. Here, we optimise non-solvent phase separation methods for producing PE, PP, PET, and PS nanoplastics and describe the characteristics of the produced materials. The following three different solvents were tested for compatibility: xylene, toluene, and phenol. Xylene and toluene were determined to be suitable for PE and PP, whereas, phenol was determined to be the most suitable solvent for PET and PS nanoplastic production. The particles created were characterised using DLS, SEM, FTIR and Raman to determine their size, shape, and chemical composition. A multiplicity of plastic particle morphologies was observed by SEM, but the predominant shape detected were irregular fragments, which represents a more environmentally realistic morphology. The size of the particles was also measured using SEM and demonstrated that the mean size for PP, PE, PET, and PS was 161.1 ± 119.2 nm, 113.6± 109 nm of 168.0 ± 94 nm, and 238.5 ± 107 nm respectively. The particles produced by the proposed method can be used as relevant reference materials and can support standardisation and increase quality control. Moreover, if labelled they have the potential to be use as an internal standard, further contributing to quality control. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/558892/document

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The production and characterisation of nanoplastic reference material: optimization and method development

Researchers developed and optimized non-solvent phase separation methods for producing polyethylene, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polystyrene nanoplastic reference materials more representative of environmental particles than commercial polystyrene spheres. They tested three solvents and found xylene and toluene suitable for PE and PP production, characterizing the resulting materials to support standardized nanoplastic research.

Article Tier 2

Nanoplastics Identification in Complex Environmental Matrices: Strategies for Polystyrene and Polypropylene

Researchers developed and compared analytical strategies for detecting and identifying polystyrene and polypropylene nanoplastics in complex environmental matrices, evaluating techniques including pyrolysis-GC/MS, Raman spectroscopy, and electron microscopy, and proposing a multi-method workflow for environmental samples.

Article Tier 2

A reliable procedure to obtain environmentally relevant nanoplastic proxies

Researchers developed a reliable procedure for producing nanoplastic proxies with properties more representative of environmentally aged nanoplastics, addressing the urgent need for better reference materials in nanoplastic fate, transport, and toxicology research.

Article Tier 2

Preparation of Nanoplastic Particles as Potential Standards for the Study of Nanoplastics

Researchers developed methods to prepare well-defined nanoplastic particles as potential reference standards for nanoplastic research, addressing the critical shortage of reliable materials for toxicity studies and analytical method validation. The study characterized the size, shape, and surface properties of the produced particles to confirm their suitability as standards.

Article Tier 2

Preparation of environmentally relevant nanoplastics (e-NPs), benefit for fate, behavior and ecotoxicology studies

Researchers developed a method to produce environmentally relevant model nanoplastics by extracting particles from weathered plastic debris collected from the North Pacific garbage patch through agitation, sonication, and sequential filtration. The resulting nanoplastics were characterized using pyrolysis-GCMS, ATR-FTIR, and potentiometric titrations, showing mainly anisotropic particle shapes with surface properties closer to real environmental nanoplastics than commercial polystyrene beads.

Share this paper