0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Innovative bioretention filters effectively remove microplastics from polluted stormwater

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2024
Ann-Margret Hvitt Strömvall, Glenn Johansson, Maria Polukarova, Karin Karlfeldt Fedje, Karin Karlfeldt Fedje, Oskar Modin, Oskar Modin, Kajsa Enhörning, Marie Haeger‐Eugensson, Yvonne Andersson‐Sköld

Summary

Researchers evaluated a pilot rain garden facility with 13 bioretention filters incorporating sorbent materials including waste-to-energy bottom ash, biochar, and Sphagnum peat mixed with sandy loam, testing their ability to remove microplastics from highway stormwater over 48 months using pyrolysis-GC/MS analysis. They found that the innovative filters effectively reduced microplastic concentrations across all 13 target polymers, with polyisoprene and styrene-butadiene rubber among the highest-concentration contaminants in the stormwater inflow.

Untreated stormwater is a major source of rubber tyre particles and other microplastics present in urban water courses. The aim of this study was to investigate bioretention filters with different sorption materials to clarify sorption processes and determine the removal efficiency of microplastics from urban stormwater. A pilot rain garden facility with 13 bioretention filters was constructed and stormwater from a highway and adjacent impervious surfaces was used for irrigation, and microplastics in inflow and outflow from the filters were studied over 48 months. A combination of the following plants was selected: Armeria maritima, Hippophae rhamnoides, Juncus effusus, and Festuca rubra and were planted in ten filters. These plants were selected because they can stand in water but also withstand droughts, tolerate increased salinity, and can degrade and/or absorb traffic-related pollutants. The innovation with these filters is that they also contain sorbent materials such as waste-to-energy bottom ash, biochar, or Sphagnum peat, mixed with sandy loam. Influent and effluent samples from the filters were taken to evaluate the removal efficiencies of the microplastic polymers analysed with pyrolysis-GC/MS. In the stormwater used for irrigation, and pumped from a stormwater sedimentation chamber, all 13 polymers analysed were quantified in at least one of the samples (n=23), and the following microplastics were present in the highest concentrations: polyisoprene ¿ styrene-butadiene rubber ¿ polybutadiene = polyethylene ¿ polyvinyl chloride ¿ polypropylene ¿polyamide-6,6. The results clearly show that rubber tyre-related polymers dominate in urban stormwater. The preliminary results also showed that all the filters efficiently removed microplastics ¿10 µm up to about 95 Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559610/document

Share this paper