0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in the Rural Environment: Sources, Transport, and Impacts

Pollutants 2026 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Awnon Bhowmik, Goutam Kumar Saha

Summary

This review synthesized research on microplastic contamination in rural environments, which have received far less attention than urban and marine settings. Researchers found that rural lakes, streams, soils, and groundwater contain significant levels of microplastics from sources like agricultural plastics, domestic waste, and atmospheric deposition. The findings challenge the assumption that rural areas are free from microplastic pollution and highlight the need for better monitoring and policy frameworks in these underrepresented regions.

Models
Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (MPs)—synthetic polymer particles less than 5 mm in size—have emerged as ubiquitous contaminants in terrestrial and aquatic environments worldwide, raising concerns about their ecological and human health impacts. While research has predominantly focused on urban and marine settings, evidence shows that rural ecosystems are also affected, challenging assumptions of pristine conditions outside cities and coasts. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the presence, pathways, and impacts of MPs in rural environments, highlighting complex contamination dynamics driven by both local sources (agricultural plastics, domestic waste, rural wastewater, and road runoff) and regional processes (atmospheric deposition, hydrological transport, and sediment transfer). Key findings highlight that rural lakes, streams, soils, and groundwater systems are active sinks and secondary sources of diverse MPs, predominantly polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in fibrous and fragmented forms. These particles vary in size, density, and color, influencing their transport, persistence, and bioavailability. Ecological effects include bioaccumulation in freshwater species, soil degradation, and potential food chain transfer, while human exposure risks stem from contaminated groundwater, air, and locally produced food. Despite these growing threats, rural systems remain underrepresented in monitoring and policy frameworks. The article calls for context-specific mitigation strategies, enhanced wastewater treatment, rural waste management reforms, and integrated microplastics surveillance across environmental compartments.

Share this paper