0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments: Evaluating the current understanding to identify the knowledge gaps and future research priorities

The Science of The Total Environment 2017 3493 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
David J. Spurgeon, Alexander Walton, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Claus Svendsen Claus Svendsen Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Alexander Walton, Alexander Walton, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, David J. Spurgeon, Elma Lahive, Alice A. Horton, Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen Alice A. Horton, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen Claus Svendsen Claus Svendsen Elma Lahive, David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, Alice A. Horton, David J. Spurgeon, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Alice A. Horton, Claus Svendsen Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, Claus Svendsen Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen Claus Svendsen Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen Claus Svendsen David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, Claus Svendsen Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen Claus Svendsen David J. Spurgeon, Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen David J. Spurgeon, Alice A. Horton, Alice A. Horton, David J. Spurgeon, David J. Spurgeon, Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen Elma Lahive, Elma Lahive, Claus Svendsen Claus Svendsen Alice A. Horton, Claus Svendsen David J. Spurgeon, Claus Svendsen David J. Spurgeon, Claus Svendsen

Summary

This review evaluates the current understanding of microplastic pollution in freshwater and terrestrial environments, which have received far less research attention than marine systems despite being major sources and accumulation zones. Researchers highlight that agricultural areas, urban centers, and wastewater treatment processes are key pathways for microplastic contamination on land. The paper identifies critical knowledge gaps and calls for more research into how microplastics behave and persist in soils and freshwater systems.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic debris is an environmentally persistent and complex contaminant of increasing concern. Understanding the sources, abundance and composition of microplastics present in the environment is a huge challenge due to the fact that hundreds of millions of tonnes of plastic material is manufactured for societal use annually, some of which is released to the environment. The majority of microplastics research to date has focussed on the marine environment. Although freshwater and terrestrial environments are recognised as origins and transport pathways of plastics to the oceans, there is still a comparative lack of knowledge about these environmental compartments. It is highly likely that microplastics will accumulate within continental environments, especially in areas of high anthropogenic influence such as agricultural or urban areas. This review critically evaluates the current literature on the presence, behaviour and fate of microplastics in freshwater and terrestrial environments and, where appropriate, also draws on relevant studies from other fields including nanotechnology, agriculture and waste management. Furthermore, we evaluate the relevant biological and chemical information from the substantial body of marine microplastic literature, determining the applicability and comparability of this data to freshwater and terrestrial systems. With the evidence presented, the authors have set out the current state of the knowledge, and identified the key gaps. These include the volume and composition of microplastics entering the environment, behaviour and fate of microplastics under a variety of environmental conditions and how characteristics of microplastics influence their toxicity. Given the technical challenges surrounding microplastics research, it is especially important that future studies develop standardised techniques to allow for comparability of data. The identification of these research needs will help inform the design of future studies, to determine both the extent and potential ecological impacts of microplastic pollution in freshwater and terrestrial environments.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper