We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effects of micro(nano)plastics on amphibian cell lines
Summary
Researchers tested the effects of micro- and nanoplastics on amphibian cell lines derived from multiple species, using cell-based methods as alternatives to whole-organism testing for initial toxicity screening. Plastic particles caused cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in amphibian cells, providing data relevant to conservation concerns for declining amphibian populations.
Plastic materials, when released into the environment are submitted to abiotic and biotic processes that promote their fragmentation into microplastics (100 nm ¡ MP ¡ 5 mm) and nanoplastics (NP ¡ 100 nm). The increased concern regarding the presence of plastic particles in the environment led to the search for alternative materials like bioplastics. Whether bio-based plastics are more environmentally friendly than conventional fuel-based plastics is yet to be proven. There is thus the need to study the impact of small plastic particles, in organisms that are under anthropogenic pressure, like amphibians. However, ethical constraints limit the tests that can be used to understand the dangers of MP and NP in these organisms. Therefore in vitro cellular models based on established cell lines are of great importance for the risk assessment of MP and NP. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of micro(nano)plastics of two fuel-based polymers (polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and polystyrene (PS)) and one biobased polymer (polylactic acid (PLA)) on two amphibian cell lines A6 (adult Xenopus laevis kidney epithelial cell line) and XTC-2 (tadpole Xenopus laevis carcass fibroblast cell line). The selected cell lines were exposed to NP (from 0 to 400 mg/L) and MP (from 0 to 200 mg/L) obtained by laboratory synthesis (PMMA) or fragmentation of larger particles (environmentally relevant shapes – PS and PLA), and cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production were respectively evaluated using MTT assay (at 72 hours) and DCFDA assay (at 3 hours). Overall, no significant effects on the viability of A6 cells were observed after exposure to PMMA NP, despite the increase in ROS production, while cell viability decreased after exposure to PLA MP. The viability of XTC-2 decreased at the highest concentration of PLA MP and PMMA NP, while PS MP induced no significant effects on cell viability. Also see: https://micro2024.sciencesconf.org/559745/document
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Effects of micro(nano)plastics on amphibian cell lines
This study assessed the effects of micro- and nanoplastics on amphibian cell lines as an alternative model system for evaluating plastic toxicity, responding to growing concerns about particle impacts on amphibians and the value of cell-based testing. Plastic particles caused measurable cellular damage in amphibian cells, supporting their use as a screening tool.
Ecotoxicological perspectives of microplastic pollution in amphibians
This review summarizes research on how microplastics affect amphibians, which are considered important indicator species for freshwater pollution. Researchers found evidence that microplastics can impair amphibian growth, immune function, and gene expression, with effects varying by species and particle characteristics. The findings raise concerns about the vulnerability of amphibian populations already threatened by habitat loss and other environmental stressors.
Microplastics as an emerging threat to amphibians: Current status and future perspectives
This review summarizes existing research on microplastic contamination in amphibians like frogs and salamanders, finding that over 80% of studied species had accumulated microplastics. The particles persisted in organs, showed toxic and gene-damaging effects, and could transfer through the food chain. Since amphibians are indicators of environmental health, widespread microplastic accumulation in these animals signals broader ecosystem contamination that can ultimately affect human food and water sources.
How much are microplastics harmful to the health of amphibians? A study with pristine polyethylene microplastics and Physalaemus cuvieri
Researchers exposed frog tadpoles (Physalaemus cuvieri) to polyethylene microplastics and found significant harmful effects including DNA damage, cell toxicity, and abnormal physical development. The microplastics accumulated in multiple tissues including the gills, gut, liver, muscle, and blood. The study provides some of the first evidence that microplastics can affect amphibian health, adding to concerns about their impact on freshwater wildlife.
Microplastic pollution and amphibian health: Complex physiological effects of different microplastic types on juvenile Glandirana rugosa
Researchers studied how polypropylene and polyethylene microplastics affect juvenile frogs and found significantly higher mortality rates in microplastic-exposed groups. The frogs showed elevated stress hormones, signs of oxidative damage, and elongated intestines, suggesting their bodies were trying to adapt to the particles. The study highlights that microplastics pose both physical and chemical risks to amphibians, which may contribute to population declines.