We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Bioaccessibility of plastic-related compounds from polymeric particles in marine settings: Are microplastics the principal vector of phthalate ester congeners and bisphenol A towards marine vertebrates?
Summary
Researchers studied whether microplastics are a major pathway for delivering harmful plastic chemicals like phthalates and bisphenol A to marine animals during digestion. They found that while microplastics do release these compounds under simulated gut conditions, the amounts were relatively low compared to other environmental sources. The study suggests that microplastics may not be the primary route of chemical exposure for marine vertebrates, though they still contribute to the overall burden.
Marine vertebrates are known to ingest significant amounts of microplastics (MPs). Once ingested, MPs might cause gastrointestinal injuries and serve as a path of harmful plastic components, such as phthalate esters (PAEs) and bisphenol A (BPA) in the food chain. However, there is a lack of standardized in-vitro methods capable of simulating fish uptake of chemicals from MPs in the environment as potential vectors of such contaminants. In this work, leaching and in-vitro oral bioaccessibility testing of PAEs and BPA from MPs were conducted batchwise using artificial seawater and gut fluids mimicking gastric, intestinal, and gastrointestinal compartments of marine vertebrates at physiological temperature. The environmental and physiologically relevant extraction tests were applied to medium-density polyethylene (PE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) certified reference materials containing eight PAEs of varying hydrophobicity, namely, dimethyl phthalate (DMP), diethyl phthalate (DEP), di-n-butyl phthalate, benzylbutyl phthalate, diethylhexyl phthalate, di-n-octyl phthalate, diisononyl phthalate and diisodecyl phthalate, and BPA (only in PE) as MP surrogates with realistic analyte concentrations of additives for primary MPs. The analysis of the leachates/gut fluid extracts was performed via dilute-and-shoot by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Only the most hydrophilic compounds, i.e. DMP, DEP and BPA, were found to get released significantly in saline waters, and exhibited the highest oral bioaccessibility rates (34-83 %). Based on our results, a dual-compartment physiologically relevant gastrointestinal test is recommended for appropriate estimation of fish bioaccessibility. The fish daily intakes of DMP, DEP and BPA from MPs, and seawater ingestion as well were estimated using several contamination scenarios (10th percentile as the low level, 50th percentile as the medium level and 90th percentile as the high level) based on probabilistic distributions and cumulative probability curves of measured environmental concentrations of (i) MPs in seawater throughout the world, (ii) DMP, DEP and BPA in beached MPs and those sampled in the open ocean (including both incurred and adsorbed contaminants), and (iii) DMP, DEP and BPA in seawater as reported in recent literature. Under a medium-level concentration scenario (50th percentile) in marine settings, and taking the gastrointestinal bioaccessibility factor into account, the daily intake of DMP, DEP and BPA from MPs accounted for a mere 0.02 % of the waterborne contribution. Hence, the ingestion of MPs should not be considered the primary route of fish exposure to BPA and the most polar PAEs in marine environments. However, more studies on the local and the global scales for mass concentrations of MPs and additives in marine settings are needed for further confirmation of our findings.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic as a Vector for Chemicals in the Aquatic Environment: Critical Review and Model-Supported Reinterpretation of Empirical Studies
Researchers critically reviewed the widespread hypothesis that microplastics transfer harmful chemicals to marine animals after being ingested. Using new modeling calculations, they found that for most organisms in most scenarios, the contribution of microplastics to chemical exposure is actually very small compared to what animals absorb through water and food. The study suggests that while microplastics are a legitimate environmental concern, their role as a significant chemical delivery vehicle has been overstated in much of the scientific literature.
Relative importance of microplastics as a pathway for the transfer of hydrophobic organic chemicals to marine life
Researchers assessed the relative importance of microplastics as a pathway for transferring hydrophobic organic chemicals to marine life. The study suggests that while microplastics can carry high concentrations of contaminants, factors like gut surfactants, pH, and temperature influence desorption rates, and modeling indicates other exposure routes may be more significant in natural environments.
Evaluating microplastic particles as vectors of exposure for plastic additive chemicals using a food web model
Researchers used a bioaccumulation model to estimate how much chemical exposure humans and wildlife receive specifically from ingesting microplastic particles — versus other environmental routes — and found that microplastics only become a meaningful source of chemical additives when ingestion rates are high and the plastic contains substantial concentrations of hydrophobic chemicals. The work helps clarify when microplastics are a significant chemical vector, finding that health risks from this pathway are likely negligible at currently estimated ingestion rates.
Weight of Evidence for the Microplastic Vector Effect in the Context of Chemical Risk Assessment
This study critically evaluates the evidence for microplastics acting as vectors that increase organism exposure to plastic-associated chemicals, finding that the vector effect is generally minor compared to other exposure routes in realistic environmental scenarios.
Modeling the Role of Microplastics in Bioaccumulation of Organic Chemicals to Marine Aquatic Organisms. A Critical Review
Researchers reviewed mathematical models used to predict whether swallowing microplastics causes aquatic animals to absorb more toxic chemicals, finding that the effect depends on whether contaminants are more concentrated in the plastic or in the animal's tissues. In real-world conditions where animals are already exposed to contaminants, microplastics may actually pull chemicals out of tissues as often as they add them, complicating the assumption that microplastic ingestion always increases contamination.