We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Combined toxic effects of polystyrene microplastic and benzophenone-4 on the bioaccumulation, feeding, growth, and reproduction of Daphnia magna
Summary
Researchers examined the combined toxic effects of polystyrene microplastics and the UV filter chemical benzophenone-4 on water fleas over 21 days. They found that exposure to both contaminants together caused greater harm to feeding, growth, and reproduction than either pollutant alone. The study demonstrates that microplastics and personal care product chemicals can interact to amplify their negative effects on freshwater organisms.
The potential toxicity of microplastics (MPs) and UV filter Benzophenone-4 (BP4) to aquatic organisms has caused widespread concern among the public. However, the combined effects of MPs and BP4 on aquatic organisms are not well understood. This study sought to examine the combined impacts of 10 μg/L BP4, 1 mg/L Polystyrene (PS, 10 μm), and a mixture of both on the feeding, behavior, growth, and reproduction of Daphnia magna (D. magna) over a period of 21 days. The results showed that the combined exposure led to a reciprocal facilitation of bioaccumulation, along with a decrease in the second antenna beats frequency in D. magna. While the co-exposure did not change the body size or growth rate of D. magna, it did affect their feeding efficiency, leading to a decrease in Chlorella ingestion within a 24-h period. Furthermore, there was a high occurrence of malformations in two generations of D. magna exposed to BP4 and PS. The combined exposure also negatively affected reproductive parameters, such as the cumulative number of neonates and the days of first brood, suggesting a decline in overall reproductive success possibly due to feeding inhibition, with available energy potentially being redistributed between reproduction and growth in the daphnids. Co-exposure to BP4 and PS also led to elevated levels of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Malonydialdehyde (MDA), and Glutathione (GSH) levels, as well as mRNA levels related to reproduction, growth, and detoxification in D. magna. Overall, this study delved into the consequences of BP4 and PS on bioaccumulation, feeding, behavior, growth, and reproduction, demonstrating that simultaneous exposure to BP4 and PS could pose a synergistic ecological hazard, potentially threatening aquatic organisms. These findings are critical and should be taken into account for accurate environmental risk assessments.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Short-term and long-term effects of microplastics and organic UV-filters on the invertebrate model species Daphnia magna
Researchers exposed water fleas to polystyrene microplastics, a mixture of UV-filter chemicals found in sunscreens, or both over 21 days. The microplastics alone reduced body size and reproduction, while combined exposure with UV-filters further impaired swimming behavior and offspring production. The study highlights that microplastics and common personal care product chemicals can interact to create compounding negative effects on freshwater organisms.
Synergistic effect of microplastic fragments and benzophenone‐3 additives on lethal and sublethal Daphnia magna toxicity
Researchers assessed the combined effects of polyethylene microplastic fragments and the UV-filter additive benzophenone-3 on the water flea Daphnia magna. They found that microplastic fragments were significantly more acutely toxic than the dissolved additive alone, and the combination produced synergistic lethal and sublethal effects. The study highlights that microplastic particles carrying chemical additives may pose greater risks to aquatic invertebrates than either stressor in isolation.
Combined toxicity of perfluoroalkyl substances and microplastics on the sentinel species Daphnia magna: Implications for freshwater ecosystems
This study tested how PFAS chemicals (common industrial pollutants) and PET microplastics affect water fleas, both alone and together. The combination caused worse developmental and reproductive problems than either pollutant alone, and organisms with prior chemical exposure history responded differently, showing that microplastics can amplify the harm of other environmental contaminants in ways that are difficult to predict.
First insight of the intergenerational effects of tri-n-butyl phosphate and polystyrene microplastics to Daphnia magna
Researchers studied the combined effects of polystyrene microplastics and the flame retardant tributyl phosphate on water fleas across multiple generations. They found that co-exposure caused more severe impacts on survival, growth, and reproduction than either contaminant alone, with effects persisting into subsequent generations. The study suggests that microplastics carrying adsorbed chemicals may pose compounding risks to aquatic organisms over time.
Toxicological effects of microplastics and heavy metals on the Daphnia magna
Researchers studied how polystyrene microplastics of two sizes adsorb heavy metals and how their combined presence affects the water flea Daphnia magna. They found that smaller microplastics had higher adsorption capacity for metals, and the combined toxicity shifted from antagonistic to additive effects as microplastic concentrations increased. The study reveals that smaller microplastics pose a greater toxicological risk when combined with heavy metals in aquatic environments.