We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic biomonitoring studies in aquatic species: A review & quality assessment framework
Summary
This systematic review evaluates the quality of studies that monitor microplastic contamination in marine organisms like fish and shellfish. The researchers found that only 8% of studies met rigorous quality standards, highlighting the need for better research methods so we can accurately understand how much microplastic exposure comes from eating seafood.
A large body of literature exists demonstrating the exposure, uptake, and presence of micro- and nanoplastic particles (MNPs) within marine biota. Despite this, there remain challenges in synthesizing these studies in a consistent and reliable manner which can support technology, regulatory, and policy decision-making. The most significant challenge is a lack of guidance to assess and integrate study reliability (objective quality) and relevance (ability to answer a specific question). The purpose of this study is twofold - first, to critically review and apply existing frameworks to an expanded body of literature. Second, to propose meaningful criteria to further assess study utility as it applies to the use of biomonitoring data to reliably quantitate (1) relationships between external and internal (biota) concentrations of MNPs, (2) differences among organisms, species, and/or regions, and (3) utility of species as effective biomonitors for MNPs in the marine environment. A critical screening of 409 biomonitoring studies published between 2017 and 2022 was carried out using previously established reliability criteria. Studies included 1243 unique species and 1954 distinct research units. Two gateway criteria were proposed to assess the relevance and utility for biomonitoring and risk assessment: polymer identification and the inclusion of an environmental sample (water or sediment). In comparison to previously published systematic reviews, the general quality of study design is improving with time. Nonetheless, deficiencies impacting the relevance and reliability are still common. In total, only 8 % of all studies passed the screening and gateway criteria, and scored ≥50 % in reliability, suggesting that studies which provide sufficient rigor and data to support confident quantitative analysis and decision-making remain limited. A series of recommendations for journals, reviewers, and researchers are proposed to increase the utility and impact of future studies, particularly as they are applied within the context of ecological risk assessment and decision-making.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
A Critical Assessment of Microplastics in Molluscan Shellfish with Recommendations for Experimental Protocols, Animal Husbandry, Publication, and Future Research
This review critically examined over 750 studies on microplastics in shellfish and found that most research contained serious flaws in methodology, with an average quality score below passing. While microplastics are consistently found in shellfish worldwide, the actual levels detected are extremely low, and many alarming claims in the media are based on poorly designed studies. The authors call for much stricter research standards before drawing conclusions about risks to human health from eating shellfish.
Microplastic contamination in fish: Critical review and assessment of data quality
This critical review assessed the data quality of 104 published studies on microplastic ingestion by fish, finding that inconsistent methods for sampling, extraction, and identification have produced questionable results and highlighting the need for standardized quality assurance protocols.
Quality Criteria for Microplastic Effect Studies in the Context of Risk Assessment: A Critical Review
Researchers developed 20 quality criteria to evaluate 105 published studies on the biological effects of microplastics and found that, on average, studies met less than half the quality benchmarks. No single study scored positively on all criteria, confirming an urgent need for better experimental standards in the field. The review highlights that the most critical improvements needed involve verifying background contamination and using environmentally realistic exposure conditions.
Quality Criteria for the Analysis of Microplastic in Biota Samples: A Critical Review
Ten quality criteria were applied to review recent microplastic ingestion studies in aquatic biota, finding wide variation in methodological rigor including inadequate sample sizes, poor contamination controls, and inconsistent polymer identification methods. The authors propose a standardized quality assessment framework to improve comparability of microplastic ingestion data across studies.
A critical view on microplastic quantification in aquatic organisms
Researchers critically reviewed the methods used to quantify microplastics in aquatic organisms including zooplankton, bivalves, and fish. The study highlights that no standardized methodology exists for measuring microplastic contamination in biota, which makes comparing results across studies difficult and underscores the need for consistent analytical protocols.