0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Quality Criteria for the Analysis of Microplastic in Biota Samples: A Critical Review

Environmental Science & Technology 2018 528 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Ten quality criteria were applied to review recent microplastic ingestion studies in aquatic biota, finding wide variation in methodological rigor including inadequate sample sizes, poor contamination controls, and inconsistent polymer identification methods. The authors propose a standardized quality assessment framework to improve comparability of microplastic ingestion data across studies.

Data on ingestion of microplastics by marine biota are quintessential for monitoring and risk assessment of microplastics in the environment. Current studies, however, portray a wide spread in results on the occurrence of microplastic ingestion, highlighting a lack of comparability of results, which might be attributed to a lack of standardization of methods. We critically review and evaluate recent microplastic ingestion studies in aquatic biota, propose a quality assessment method for such studies, and apply the assessment method to the reviewed studies. The quality assessment method uses ten criteria: sampling method and strategy, sample size, sample processing and storage, laboratory preparation, clean air conditions, negative controls, positive controls, target component, sample (pre)treatment, and polymer identification. The results of this quality assessment show a dire need for stricter quality assurance in microplastic ingestion studies. On average, studies score 8.0 out of 20 points for "completeness of information" and 0 for "reliability". Alongside the assessment method, a standardized protocol for detecting microplastic in biota samples incorporating these criteria is provided.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Freshwater Biota: A Critical Review of Isolation, Characterization, and Assessment Methods

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review examined methodological challenges in isolating, characterizing, and assessing microplastics in freshwater biota, identifying key gaps in standardization that limit comparability across studies and impede understanding of microplastic ingestion, translocation, and trophic transfer in freshwater ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

A critical view on microplastic quantification in aquatic organisms

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers critically reviewed the methods used to quantify microplastics in aquatic organisms including zooplankton, bivalves, and fish. The study highlights that no standardized methodology exists for measuring microplastic contamination in biota, which makes comparing results across studies difficult and underscores the need for consistent analytical protocols.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic contamination in fish: Critical review and assessment of data quality

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review assessed the data quality of 104 published studies on microplastic ingestion by fish, finding that inconsistent methods for sampling, extraction, and identification have produced questionable results and highlighting the need for standardized quality assurance protocols.

Article Tier 2

Recent advances in the analysis methodologies for microplastics in aquatic organisms: current knowledge and research challenges

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines recent advances in analytical methods for detecting and quantifying microplastics in aquatic organisms, identifying key sources of variability across studies and outlining research challenges needed to improve comparability and standardization.

Article Tier 2

Towards the suitable monitoring of ingestion of microplastics by marine biota: A review

AI summary Read the abstract

This review assessed various monitoring methods for detecting microplastic ingestion by marine biota, comparing laboratory and field-based approaches. The authors recommend method selection based on organism type and research question and call for more consistent reporting standards to enable cross-study comparison.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper