We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Application of MATLAB and SAS Viya AI models towards the elucidation of potential microplastics in the Neuse River Basin
Summary
Researchers applied MATLAB and SAS Viya AI models, including Principal Component Analysis and other machine learning approaches, to identify and characterize microplastics in water samples from the Neuse River Basin, where weathering processes obscure native spectroscopic signatures. The AI-enhanced approach improved microplastic identification accuracy compared to conventional spectroscopic methods alone.
Microplastics (MPLs) are ubiquitous particles derived from degradation from plastic refuse or directly from anthropogenic sources. These particles are present in aquatic environments with potential toxicology across the biosphere. In order to characterize their presence, the Neuse River basin was selected for sampling. However, like many MPLs, spectroscopic characterization can be sullied by weathering processes that obscure the native spectra. Therefore, to enhance MPL identification, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), K-means Clustering (KMC), MATLAB, and SAS Viya’s machine learning (ML) modules were implemented on the Neuse River basin's samples. 18 unknown samples were recorded with attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy against the controls for PCA and KMC: high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and nylon-6 (PA6). Later on, these unknowns were tested against a new set of 900 commercial control samples partitioned by 9 classes for MATLAB and SAS Viya: cellulose acetate (CA), HDPE, LDPE, PP, PS, PVC, PET, polymethyl(methacrylate) (PMMA), and PA6 using µ-FTIR (micro-FTIR) for single-particle discrepancy. Application of MATLAB’s Classification Learner and SAS Viya for Learners software helped aggregate multiple machine learning (ML) models to test for corroboration of predictions with datasets derived from Version 1 (V1), Version 2 (V2), and Version 3 (V3) feature extraction algorithms. Novel feature extractions, based on regressions of discrete data from spectral intensities, in V2 and unique probing of the relationships informing the regressions in V3 showed moderate to moderately high predictor strength, contributing to accuracy increase in V3 according to various predictor strength algorithms in MATLAB. In the test scenario of the strongest version, V3, 63.2% (+ 5.3% from V1) of the models performed very strongly (90% cutoff in accuracy), and 89.5% (+ 0% from V1) of the models performed moderately strongly (80% cutoff in accuracy). The models, coupled with the unsupervised PCA and KMC, indicated microparticle (MP) from Stockinghead Creek in Duplin County, NC; SHR-1b(2), as LDPE. However, the change in corroboration across model types was not significant, according to Kruskal-Wallis (H = 0.555, p = .7577). An ANOVA was performed to see if LDPE incidence was similar across all unknowns, indicating a similar ratio of predictions, excluding NRCP-1 (F = 31.479, p < .0001). While it is unclear if this particle is truly LDPE, the results may suggest that LDPE could be of high presence in the river basin (specifically, PE) when taking into account the predictor set across all versions. Lastly, misclassification was further elucidated for samples “CF-3” and “NRCP-1(2)” which are thought to be extensively-degraded PVC MPLs.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Application of MATLAB and SAS Viya AI Models towards the Elucidation of Potential Microplastics in the Neuse River Basin
Researchers collected 18 water samples from the Neuse River basin and applied ATR-FTIR spectroscopy combined with principal component analysis, K-means clustering, MATLAB Classification Learner, and SAS Viya machine learning models to identify weathered microplastic particles whose spectra are obscured by environmental degradation. The multi-model approach improved identification accuracy by comparing against both a 7-polymer and a 9-polymer reference library.
AI-Driven Framework Development for Predictive Classification of Microplastic Concentration of Aquatic Systems in the United States
Researchers compared four machine learning models—logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and a neural network—for predicting microplastic density in US coastal waters across three regions. The support vector machine performed best with 93.94% average accuracy, demonstrating the potential of AI-driven tools for microplastic monitoring.
Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning for Microplastics Identification and Classification in Water Environments
Researchers combined Raman spectroscopy with machine learning algorithms for automated identification and classification of microplastics in water environments, achieving high accuracy in distinguishing different polymer types based on spectral fingerprints.
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approaches for Automatic Microplastics Identification and Characterization
This review examines how artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms are being applied to identify, characterize, and model microplastic pollution in the environment. The authors found that these tools can analyze large sensor datasets to detect microplastics in water bodies, predict transport patterns, and model adsorption behavior under various environmental conditions. The study highlights the growing role of computational approaches in understanding and mitigating microplastic contamination.
Machine Learning Method for Microplastic Identification Using a Combination of Machine Learning and Raman Spectroscopy
Researchers developed a machine learning method for identifying microplastics using a combination of multiple spectroscopic techniques, improving classification accuracy beyond single-method approaches and enabling automated polymer identification.