0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Reducing the carbon footprint of railway sleepers using recycled plastics

Frontiers in Sustainability 2024 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Heikki Luomala, Rami Halme, Ilari Jönkkäri

Summary

Researchers evaluated the carbon footprint reduction potential of using recycled plastic materials in railway sleeper (tie) manufacturing, comparing lifecycle emissions against conventional concrete and hardwood sleepers. Recycled plastic sleepers showed substantial carbon savings over their full lifecycle.

Polymers

The primary contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in railway transport include the energy consumed during transportation, the materials used for infrastructure construction, and maintenance. Track structures commonly employ materials with a substantial carbon footprint, such as concrete and steel. This article explores the feasibility of using materials with a smaller carbon footprint for track structures. Recycled plastics that are currently incinerated might serve as a viable alternative. The key research question revolves around whether GHG emissions resulting from track construction and maintenance can be reduced by utilizing recycled plastics. Among various track components, sleepers were chosen as a potential application for recycled plastic due to their substantial material usage and consequent impact on overall emissions. The study also investigated the necessary material properties for plastic sleepers and assessed whether recycled plastic could meet those requirements. The study investigated recycled plastic fractions, including waste materials recycled by incineration, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), and a byproduct of liquid packaging cardboard repulping (LPB repulping reject). These materials offer a reduced carbon footprint because they have already completed one life cycle and can still be recycled as material. To assess their mechanical properties, laboratory tests were conducted on injection-molded test rods made from recycled plastic components. These rods underwent tensile and bending tests using a universal testing device. Additionally, the softening temperatures of the materials were measured through Vicat and HDT tests. Finally, based on the amount of waste material flows, the emission reduction potential obtained using recycled plastic was evaluated. Recycled ABS is significantly more suitable for use in track structures due to its superior mechanical durability compared to LPB repulping reject. Additionally, recycling ABS as a sleeper material significantly reduces overall GHG emissions compared to incineration.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Savings of Replacing Concrete with Recycled Polycarbonate and Sand Composite

Researchers conducted a life cycle assessment comparing recycled polycarbonate-sand composites to conventional concrete, finding significant reductions in carbon emissions. The recycled composite achieved compressive strength of 71 megapascals, far exceeding typical concrete performance. The study suggests that replacing concrete with recycled plastic composites in construction could simultaneously address plastic waste and reduce the carbon footprint of the built environment.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of carbon emission potential of polyvinyl chloride plastics

Researchers used life cycle assessment to quantify carbon emissions from PVC plastic production and recycling, finding that producing 1 kg of PVC generates 7.83 kg CO2-equivalent, with fossil fuel-derived acetylene as the largest contributor, highlighting opportunities to reduce emissions by substituting raw materials.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability Performance of Voided Concrete Slab Using Waste Plastic Bottles

Researchers investigated the sustainability performance of voided concrete slabs incorporating waste plastic bottles as void formers, assessing cost reduction, embodied energy, and CO2 emissions relative to conventional solid slabs. They found that using waste plastic bottles reduced material costs and embodied energy while also lowering CO2 emissions, supporting their use as an environmentally beneficial construction approach.

Article Tier 2

Assessing the environmental footprint of recycled plastic pellets: A life-cycle assessment perspective

This study used life-cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of producing recycled plastic pellets from waste polyolefin plastics. While recycling reduced carbon emissions compared to making new plastic, the process still required significant energy, especially when solvent recovery was maximized. The research is relevant to the microplastics problem because it shows that even recycling processes need optimization to truly reduce the environmental footprint of plastic waste.

Article Tier 2

Sustainable Development and Assessment of Low-Strength/High-Toughness Recycled Plastic Rebars for Structural Elements Under Light Loads

Researchers manufactured full-scale rebars from recycled HDPE and polypropylene for mortar-free, light-load construction applications, testing 48 samples across three diameters and demonstrating that recycled plastic rebars can meet structural requirements while addressing plastic waste.

Share this paper