0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Assessing the environmental footprint of recycled plastic pellets: A life-cycle assessment perspective

Environmental Technology & Innovation 2023 84 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Junaid Saleem, Junaid Saleem, Junaid Saleem, Junaid Saleem, Junaid Saleem, Junaid Saleem, Junaid Saleem, Junaid Saleem, Zubair Khalid Baig Moghal, Gordon McKay Zubair Khalid Baig Moghal, Zubair Khalid Baig Moghal, Furqan Tahir, Tareq Al‐Ansari, Gordon McKay Tareq Al‐Ansari, Zubair Khalid Baig Moghal, Tareq Al‐Ansari, Gordon McKay Gordon McKay Gordon McKay Gordon McKay Gordon McKay

Summary

This study used life-cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of producing recycled plastic pellets from waste polyolefin plastics. While recycling reduced carbon emissions compared to making new plastic, the process still required significant energy, especially when solvent recovery was maximized. The research is relevant to the microplastics problem because it shows that even recycling processes need optimization to truly reduce the environmental footprint of plastic waste.

Polymers

Plastic production has significant environmental impacts, including water pollution, global warming, resource depletion, and microplastic pollution. To address this, it is crucial to reduce plastic production and find more sustainable alternatives. While recycling plastic waste can help mitigate environmental impacts, it requires careful assessment. This study evaluates the environmental impact of producing polymer pellets from recycled polyolefin-based plastic waste using life-cycle assessment with Gabi software. Xylene is used as a solvent and later recovered. Two scenarios with different xylene recovery levels are assessed. The results show that 100% xylene recovery consumes more energy but reduces the carbon footprint. Additionally, carbon emissions during pellet production from plastic waste are 22.6%, and other impacts are in the range of 11%–40% lower compared to virgin polypropylene PP. The use of solar photovoltaic electricity demonstrates potential in reducing overall environmental impacts, except for human toxicity. The carbon emissions are found to be 41.8% lower than that of virgin PP. The study emphasizes the importance of sustainable techniques in mitigating plastic waste effects and offers insights for policymakers and stakeholders interested in a circular economy.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper