0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Effects of microplastic on submerged nanofiltration for advanced drinking water treatment

Scientific Reports 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Thanyapon Kaewjan, Prattakorn Sittisom, Takahiro Fujioka, Phacharapol Induvesa, Aunnop Wongrueng

Summary

Researchers investigated how microplastics in reservoir water affect the performance of submerged nanofiltration membranes used for drinking water treatment. The study found that the presence of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics influenced the removal of dissolved organic matter by the membrane, with implications for optimizing advanced water treatment processes.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

The removal of organic matter from drinking water is critical for protecting public health. However, their removal by an emerging process, submerged nanofiltration (NF), can be affected by competing substances, such as microplastics (MPs). This study aimed to investigate the impact of MPs in reservoir water on the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) using a submerged NF membrane. In the experiments, a loose NF membrane (NF270) was operated at a pressure below 0.1 MPa. Polyethylene terephthalate microplastics (PET-MPs) were introduced into the feed water at concentrations of 0, 10, 100, and 1,000 mg/L for filtration cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The results showed that the permeate flux did not significantly differ across all cycles, ranging between 12.7 and 14.7 L/m²·h. Increasing PET-MP concentrations adversely affected DOM removal efficiency, which was analyzed in terms of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (surrogate indicator of humic acid concentrations). Specifically, as the PET-MP concentration increased from 0 to 1,000 mg/L, the DOC removal decreased from 87.9% to 86.6%, and the UV-254 absorbance removal decreased from 97.5% to 90.0%. This study demonstrated that the submerged NF270 membrane effectively removed DOM via a size exclusion phenomenon. Humic acid promoted electrostatic repulsion and encouraged ion retention by increasing the negative electrical charge on the membrane. In contrast, water molecules, which are small and nearly uncharged, can permeate fouled membranes more readily than organic molecules. However, the removal efficiency decreased with increasing PET-MP concentration. Sponge cleaning reduced membrane surface fouling, as indicated by the stable permeate flux. Overall, this study demonstrated that submerged NF treatment can be stably operated without the effects of MPs on membrane fouling.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Analysis of membrane surface after the filtration of surface water containing microplastic

Researchers tested ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes on real river water containing microplastics and found both membrane types completely removed plastic particles from the filtered water, though the deposited microplastics reduced water flow through the membranes over time — confirming membrane filtration as an effective but imperfect water treatment strategy.

Review Tier 2

A review of microplastic removal from water and wastewater by membrane technologies

This review examines how membrane filtration technologies can remove microplastics from drinking water and wastewater. Researchers found that advanced membranes like nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and membrane bioreactors are among the most effective methods for capturing microplastic particles that conventional treatment plants miss. The study compares membrane approaches with other removal methods and discusses the challenges of membrane fouling caused by microplastic accumulation.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and removal of microplastics by advanced and conventional drinking water treatment facilities

Researchers evaluated the performance of both advanced and conventional drinking water treatment processes for removing microplastics, finding that advanced methods such as ultrafiltration substantially outperform standard coagulation and filtration. Most conventional treatment plants leave a meaningful fraction of microplastics in finished drinking water.

Article Tier 2

Occurrence and removal of microplastics by advanced and conventional drinking water treatment facilities

Researchers assessed microplastic occurrence and removal efficiency at drinking water treatment plants using both conventional and advanced treatment processes. Advanced treatment steps such as ultrafiltration and activated carbon significantly improved microplastic removal compared to conventional coagulation and filtration alone.

Article Tier 2

Release of microplastics from polymeric ultrafiltration membrane system for drinking water treatment under different operating conditions

Researchers discovered that the plastic membrane filters used to purify drinking water can actually release microplastics into the treated water. The particles came not just from the membrane itself but also from plastic equipment in the system, meaning that water treatment technology designed to remove contaminants may inadvertently be adding new plastic particles to our drinking water.

Share this paper