Article
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 2
?
Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence.
Gut & Microbiome
Marine & Wildlife
Remediation
Sign in to save
Biofilm development as a factor driving the degradation of plasticised marine microplastics
Journal of Hazardous Materials2024
12 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 50
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
George Vamvounis,
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Marina Santana
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Sara C. Bell,
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
Sara C. Bell,
Cherie A. Motti,
George Vamvounis,
Cherie A. Motti,
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Lynne van Herwerden,
Felicity Kuek,
Felicity Kuek,
Yun Kit Yeoh,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Lynne van Herwerden,
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
George Vamvounis,
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
Lynne van Herwerden,
David G. Bourne,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
Cherie A. Motti,
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
Lynne van Herwerden,
Lynne van Herwerden,
Richard C. Edmunds,
Richard C. Edmunds,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
George Vamvounis,
Marina Santana
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Yun Kit Yeoh,
Marina Santana
Yun Kit Yeoh,
George Vamvounis,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
Yui Sato,
Lynne van Herwerden,
Cherie A. Motti,
Yui Sato,
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
Pirjo Haikola,
Pirjo Haikola,
Pirjo Haikola,
Pirjo Haikola,
Lynne van Herwerden,
Lynne van Herwerden,
Alexandra M. Gulizia,
Cherie A. Motti,
Cherie A. Motti,
David G. Bourne,
David G. Bourne,
George Vamvounis,
George Vamvounis,
Marina Santana
Marina Santana
Cherie A. Motti,
Marina Santana
Summary
Researchers investigated how natural marine biofilms drive the degradation of plasticized microplastics. The study found that biodegradation was dependent on polymer type, plasticizer type, and time, with polystyrene containing bisphenol A showing the most degradation, coinciding with increased abundance of putative biodegradative bacteria in the colonizing biofilm.
Biodegradation of microplastics facilitated by natural marine biofouling is a promising approach for ocean bioremediation. However, implementation requires a comprehensive understanding of how interactions between the marine microbiome and dominant microplastic debris types (e.g., polymer and additive combinations) can influence biofilm development and drive biodegradation. To investigate this, polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) microplastics (< 200 µm in diameter) were prepared either without any additives (i.e., virgin) or containing 15 wt% of the plasticisers diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) or bisphenol A (BPA). Each polymer-plasticiser microplastic combination was exposed to environmentally relevant conditions in a simulated seawater mesocosm representative of tropical reef waters over a 21-day period to allow for natural biofilm development. Following this, microplastic degradation and the colonising bacterial biofilm was assessed as a function of time, polymer and plasticiser type using infrared, thermal, gel permeation and surface characterisation techniques, as well as 16S ribosomal RNA bacterial gene sequencing, respectively. Together, these analyses revealed time-, polymer- and plasticiser-dependent degradation, particularly of the PS-BPA microplastics. Degradation of the PS-BPA microplastics also coincided with changes in bacterial community composition and an increased total relative abundance of putative biodegradative bacteria. These findings indicate that the metabolic potential and biodegradative capability of the colonising marine biofilm can be significantly impacted by the chemical properties of the microplastic substrate, even within short timeframes.