0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics affect potassium accumulation in foxtail millet (Setaria italica) seedlings

BMC Plant Biology 2024 3 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yue Guo, Liwen Liu, Yimin Fan, Yimin Fan, Shan Yi Du, Yue Chen, Yanmin Duan, Rui Han, Shenghua Xu, G. Wen, Weijuan Zhou, Haiying Zhang, Yang Pu, Yang Pu, Lizhen Zhang, Zhen Liang, Yizhou Wang, Ben Zhang

Summary

Researchers examined how polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nano- and microplastics affect potassium uptake in foxtail millet seedlings. While PET exposure did not significantly harm germination or growth, it increased reactive oxygen species levels and triggered the upregulation of potassium transport genes, leading to higher potassium accumulation in leaves and a compensatory antioxidant response.

Polymers

BACKGROUND: As modern industrial activities have advanced, the prevalence of microplastics and nanoplastics in the environment has increased, thereby impacting plant growth. Potassium is one of the most crucial nutrient cations for plant biology. Understanding how polyethylene terephthalate (PET) treatment affects potassium uptake will deepen our understanding of plant response mechanisms to plastic pollution. RESULTS: In this study, we examined the impact of PET micro- and nanoplastics on foxtail millet seedling growth and potassium accumulation. Additionally, we measured reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, antioxidant enzyme activities, and the expression levels of the corresponding enzyme-encoding genes. Our findings indicated that the germination and seedling growth of foxtail millet were not significantly affected by exposure to PET plastics. However, the ROS levels in foxtail millet increased under these conditions. This increase in ROS led to the upregulation of several genes involved in K uptake and transport (SiHAK1, SiHAK2, SiAKT2/3, SiHKT2;2, SiHKT1;1, SiGORK, and SiSKOR), thereby increasing K accumulation in foxtail millet leaves. Further research revealed that higher K concentrations in plant leaves were correlated with increased expression of the antioxidant-related genes SiCAT1, SiPOD1, and SiSOD3, as well as increased activities of the corresponding antioxidant enzymes. This response helps mitigate the excessive accumulation and damage caused by ROS in plant cells after PET nanoplastic treatment, suggesting a potential stress response mechanism in foxtail millet against nanoplastic pollution. CONCLUSIONS: Our research indicates that PET nanoplastic treatment induces the expression of genes related to K uptake in foxtail millet through ROS signaling, leading to increased K accumulation in the leaves. This process mitigates the ROS damage caused by PET nanoplastic treatment by increasing the expression and activity of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes. The present research has unveiled the K accumulation-related response mechanism of foxtail millet to PET nanoplastic treatment, contributing significantly to our understanding of both the potassium absorption regulation mechanism in plants and the broader impact of plastic pollution on agricultural crops. This discovery not only highlights the complexity of plant responses to environmental stressors but also underscores the importance of considering such responses when evaluating the ecological and agricultural implications of plastic pollution.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Role of Trehalose in Response to Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanoplastics Treatment in Foxtail Millet ( Setaria italica ) Seedlings

This transcriptome study of foxtail millet seedlings exposed to PET nanoplastics found that trehalose metabolism played a protective role — upregulating trehalose synthesis genes reduced reactive oxygen species accumulation — offering a potential genetic target for developing nanoplastic-tolerant crops.

Article Tier 2

Rhizosphere nutrient dynamics and physiological responses of Oryza sativa L. under polyethylene terephthalate microplastic stress

Researchers exposed rice (Oryza sativa) to PET microplastics and found that the particles were absorbed by roots and translocated to aerial tissues, significantly inhibiting chlorophyll production, inducing oxidative stress (with malondialdehyde increasing by 175% at higher doses), and disrupting nitrogen, carbon, and phosphorus cycling genes in the rhizosphere.

Article Tier 2

Effect of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) microplastics on radish and carrot growth, nutrient uptake, and physiological stress responses

Researchers exposed radish and carrot seedlings to PET microplastics (0.1 g/L) for one week and measured growth, nutrient uptake, and stress markers. While plant biomass was unaffected, chlorophyll levels dropped and oxidative stress indicators rose significantly, showing physiological harm even without visible growth effects.

Article Tier 2

Impact of nanoplastics uptake on modulation of plant metabolism and stress responses: a multi-omics perspective on remediation and tolerance mechanisms

Researchers reviewed how nanoplastics accumulate in plant tissues and disrupt metabolism, finding that these particles impair nutrient uptake, trigger reactive oxygen species overproduction, and alter gene and protein expression, while multi-omics approaches are revealing the molecular stress-response networks that plants use to tolerate or remediate nanoplastic contamination.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis

This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.

Share this paper