0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis

Environmental Pollution 2023 46 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 70 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Congcong Wang, Qing Luo, Qing Luo, Liangshan Feng Qing Luo, Congcong Wang, Jieliu Zhang, Jieliu Zhang, Liangshan Feng Qing Luo, Liangshan Feng Xinyu Zhang, Ning Yang, Ning Yang, Ning Yang, Liangshan Feng Ning Yang, Liangshan Feng Liangshan Feng

Summary

This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.

Polymers
Study Type Review

Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) pervade and accumulate within the soil, exerting influences not only on plant growth and development but also on human health through the food chain. However, recent studies on the effects of MPs/NPs on plants yield diverse results. Thus, this study conducts a meta-analysis of 101 recent publications to summarize the influence of type, size, and concentration of MPs/NPs on physiological responses, photosynthetic pigments, and biochemical reactions in various plant species. The findings indicate that the effects of MPs/NPs on plants vary depending on the specific plant species. The impact of different polymer types of MPs/NPs on plants does not show a clear trend, possibly due to variations in polymer functional groups. However, it is noteworthy that polyethylene terephthalate with phenyl groups exhibits the most significant effect on plant fresh weight, chlorophyll a and b, and HO content among all microplastic types. Moreover, MPs exhibit stronger inhibition on most physiological, photosynthetic pigments, and biochemical indicators of plants compared to NPs, although root length, chlorophyll, and HO demonstrate opposite effects. The concentration of MPs/NPs elicits different responses on plant indicators, each with specific trends. Notably, exposure to MPs/NPs stimulates an increase in plant biochemical enzyme indicators. Finally, this study identifies current knowledge gaps and offers insights for future research directions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper