We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.
Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) pervade and accumulate within the soil, exerting influences not only on plant growth and development but also on human health through the food chain. However, recent studies on the effects of MPs/NPs on plants yield diverse results. Thus, this study conducts a meta-analysis of 101 recent publications to summarize the influence of type, size, and concentration of MPs/NPs on physiological responses, photosynthetic pigments, and biochemical reactions in various plant species. The findings indicate that the effects of MPs/NPs on plants vary depending on the specific plant species. The impact of different polymer types of MPs/NPs on plants does not show a clear trend, possibly due to variations in polymer functional groups. However, it is noteworthy that polyethylene terephthalate with phenyl groups exhibits the most significant effect on plant fresh weight, chlorophyll a and b, and HO content among all microplastic types. Moreover, MPs exhibit stronger inhibition on most physiological, photosynthetic pigments, and biochemical indicators of plants compared to NPs, although root length, chlorophyll, and HO demonstrate opposite effects. The concentration of MPs/NPs elicits different responses on plant indicators, each with specific trends. Notably, exposure to MPs/NPs stimulates an increase in plant biochemical enzyme indicators. Finally, this study identifies current knowledge gaps and offers insights for future research directions.
More Papers Like This
Nano- and microplastics commonly cause adverse impacts on plants at environmentally relevant levels: A systematic review
AI summary Read the abstract
Systematic review of 78 studies found that nano- and microplastics commonly cause adverse effects on plants even at environmentally relevant concentrations, with germination and root growth more strongly affected than shoot growth during early development. Chlorophyll levels were consistently reduced while stress indicators (ROS) and antioxidant enzymes were consistently upregulated across species.
Impact of microplastics on plant physiology: A meta-analysis of dose, particle size, and crop type interactions in agricultural ecosystems
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 37 studies found that microplastics significantly decrease plant biomass by 13% and chlorophyll content by 28%, while increasing oxidative stress by 20%. Higher doses and smaller particle sizes caused more damage, with particle size having a greater impact than concentration — and root activity was particularly sensitive to microplastic exposure.
Micro and Nanoplastics Interactions with Plant Species: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis pooled data from multiple studies to examine how micro- and nanoplastics affect plants. It found that nanoplastics (smaller than 100 nm) are generally more harmful to plant growth and development than larger microplastics, though staple crops showed surprisingly little effect. Since plants can absorb these tiny plastic particles, the findings raise questions about whether microplastics in soil could enter the food supply.
Bioavailability and phytotoxicity of micro/nanoplastics to aquatic plants: Trends, environmental drivers and mechanisms
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics cause significant harm to aquatic plants, reducing their biomass and chlorophyll content through oxidative stress. Polyethylene was especially damaging, cutting plant biomass by over 42%. When plastic pollution harms the base of aquatic food chains, the effects can ripple upward through ecosystems that support both wildlife and human food sources.
Ecotoxicological effects of plastics on plants, soil fauna and microorganisms: A meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Meta-analysis of 2,936 observations from 140 studies found that plastics caused substantial detrimental effects to plants and soil fauna, but had less impact on microbial diversity. Larger plastics (>1 um) impaired plant growth and germination while nanoplastics primarily increased oxidative stress, and soil fauna reproduction and survival were more adversely affected by smaller particles.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.