We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
CO2 Emissions Comparisons for Industrial and Commercial Floors: A Study on Cementous Sustainable Flooring Options
Summary
Researchers compared CO2 emissions from different cementitious flooring options for industrial and commercial buildings, evaluating the environmental performance and financial feasibility of sustainable flooring alternatives as part of broader efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the built environment.
CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions have become a major environmental issue worldwide, and emissions have spiked faster than most could ever imagine. The issues have made it crucial to find financially feasible and long-term, use-efficient solutions that fulfill industrial needs. As society so much depends on the current industry outputs, we need to reduce emissions coming from those industrial facilities and premises where people shop and buy services and assets on a daily basis. These emissions need to be reduced on a global scale, and here, concrete as a building material comes into play as one of the most used materials, especially on industrial floors. A typical solution is a sturdy base slab with a use case-specific coating on it. The base slab is expected to last the whole life of the building, whereas the coating might be considered consumable and refurbished/fixed as a maintenance job many times before the building itself is demolished. In heavy use cases, the maintenance cycle might be fast, which reduces the usable time of the building and generates downtimes for business. The coating decisions have a major impact on the building’s lifetime emissions, which is the key focus of this study, too. Bad decisions can introduce unnecessary microplastics and nano dust particles to work environments and also generate restructuring needs of the operational activities. In the worst case, operations have to be shut down. Luckily, there are options, and emissions can be reduced in many ways. By using long-term and durable cementitious mix-based dry shake coatings, one can reduce top coating-based emissions, and by decreasing the amount of used reinforcement components in the base slab, an extra positive impact can be achieved. With a base slab, also more environmentally friendly low-carbon cement formulations can be considered, like fly ash or GGBS (ground granulated blast furnace slag) based formulas, which we discuss in detail and analyses traditional options compared to modern CEM3a and CEM3b versions. For the top coating, emissions are generated in the construction and maintenance phases. To find different options with cross implications on lifetime emissions, our study analyzes CO2 emissions sources for several concrete mixes, which are then paired with floor-top coatings based on Cementous mix or epoxy coating. We have pinpointed the potential for reducing the building’s floor-based lifetime CO2 emissions. The analysis is based on the impacts of the base slab and floor coating selection combinations. As a de facto comparison element, we used a 100 percent virgin Portland cement-based mix. The Portland cement was compared to CEM3a and CEM3b mixes. On the top surface of the floor, traditional epoxy base floor coating was compared to a modern dry shake-based option. In the analysis, the dry-shake-based floor showed major benefits. Emissions were drastically reduced, fewer maintenance downtimes were needed, and the general life expectancy was a lot longer for the dry shake option.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Environmental Impact and Carbon Footprint Assessment of Sustainable Buildings: An Experimental Investigation
Researchers assessed the carbon footprint and environmental impact of sustainable building construction in Chennai, India, finding that the infrastructure sector contributes substantially to carbon emissions and that sustainable materials can reduce this footprint.
Sustainability Performance of Voided Concrete Slab Using Waste Plastic Bottles
Researchers investigated the sustainability performance of voided concrete slabs incorporating waste plastic bottles as void formers, assessing cost reduction, embodied energy, and CO2 emissions relative to conventional solid slabs. They found that using waste plastic bottles reduced material costs and embodied energy while also lowering CO2 emissions, supporting their use as an environmentally beneficial construction approach.
Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Savings of Replacing Concrete with Recycled Polycarbonate and Sand Composite
Researchers conducted a life cycle assessment comparing recycled polycarbonate-sand composites to conventional concrete, finding significant reductions in carbon emissions. The recycled composite achieved compressive strength of 71 megapascals, far exceeding typical concrete performance. The study suggests that replacing concrete with recycled plastic composites in construction could simultaneously address plastic waste and reduce the carbon footprint of the built environment.
Reducing the carbon footprint of railway sleepers using recycled plastics
Researchers evaluated the carbon footprint reduction potential of using recycled plastic materials in railway sleeper (tie) manufacturing, comparing lifecycle emissions against conventional concrete and hardwood sleepers. Recycled plastic sleepers showed substantial carbon savings over their full lifecycle.
Evaluation of particle generation due to deterioration of flooring in schools.
A simulated school-day experiment tested particle release from different flooring materials under repeated foot traffic, finding that some floor types generate substantial quantities of fine particulate matter, including plastic-containing particles, that may affect indoor air quality for children.