0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Osmoregulation affects elimination of microplastics in fish in freshwater and marine environments

The Science of The Total Environment 2025 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Hilda Mardiana Pratiwi, Toshiyuki Takagi, Suhaila Rusni, Koji Inoue

Summary

Researchers studied how fish eliminate microplastics differently in saltwater versus freshwater environments using a species of medaka fish. They found that microplastics pass through the gut faster in saltwater because the fish drink more water, which accelerates digestive fluid movement. The study suggests that a fish's natural osmoregulation processes and feeding behavior play important roles in how quickly it can clear ingested microplastics.

Polymers
Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

In recent decades, microplastics (MPs) have emerged as one of the biggest environmental challenges in aquatic environments. Ingestion and toxicity of MPs in seawater (SW) and freshwater (FW) fish have been studied extensively both in field and laboratory settings. However, the basic mechanism of how fish deal with MPs in SW and FW remains unclear, although physiological conditions of fish differ significantly in the two environments. In this study, using Javanese medaka (Oryzias javanicus), a euryhaline fish that adapts readily to both SW and FW, we investigated elimination of MPs in fish in SW and FW environments. We exposed O. javanicus larvae (21 days post-hatching) to 0.25 mg/L of fluorescent polystyrene microspheres (1 μm) for 24 hours and then conducted an elimination test for up to 5 days. Results showed that the gut retention time of MPs is longer in FW than in SW, indicating that MP elimination occurs more quickly in SW than in FW. However, higher numbers of MPs tended to be retained longer in SW larvae than FW larvae. Subsequently, using a fluorescent marker, gastrointestinal fluid was found to move more rapidly in the SW group. This finding indicates that water drinking accelerates gastrointestinal fluid movement, which moves MPs through the gut in SW larvae. Beside the difference in physiological conditions, MP elimination was faster when food was available, suggesting that feeding also affects MP elimination in fish. Internal factors such as body size and intestine length were also examined, but indicated no significant difference. Therefore, osmoregulation and feeding both influence MP elimination in fish.

Share this paper