0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Environmental impact of microplastic emissions from wastewater treatment plant through life cycle assessment

The Science of The Total Environment 2025 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
А. Г. Алибеков, Woojin Lee А. Г. Алибеков, Mira Meirambayeva, Mira Meirambayeva, А. Г. Алибеков, Mira Meirambayeva, Mira Meirambayeva, Shugyla Yengsebek, Shugyla Yengsebek, Woojin Lee Firyuza Aldyngurova, Firyuza Aldyngurova, Woojin Lee Woojin Lee

Summary

Researchers used life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impact of microplastic emissions from wastewater treatment plants. They found that microplastics accounted for 94% of the total ecotoxicity impact at the midpoint level, surpassing heavy metals and nutrients by at least two orders of magnitude, with polyethylene, polystyrene, and polypropylene identified as the most impactful polymer types.

Study Type Environmental

This study aimed to quantify the environmental impact of microplastic (MP) emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) using life cycle assessment (LCA). The investigation comprehensively evaluated the contribution of MPs to overall WWTP midpoint and endpoint impacts, with a detailed analysis of the influence of particle size, shape, polymer type, and the environmental costs and benefits of individual wastewater treatment processes on MP removal. The LCA model was developed using SimaPro software, with impact assessments conducted via the USEtox framework and the IMPACT World+ methodology. Results showed that at the midpoint level, MPs accounted for 1.24E+05 CTUe (94 % of the total plant impact), representing the potential harm to aquatic species per cubic meter of discharged wastewater-surpassing the impacts of other contaminants (e.g., heavy metals, nutrients) by at least two orders of magnitude. At the endpoint level, the damage of 8.39E-02 PDF·m<sup>2</sup>·yr (1.7 % of the total) indicated the potential loss of species diversity, comparable to other pollutant contributions. Polyethylene, polystyrene, and polypropylene were identified as the most impactful polymer types. In terms of environmental costs and benefits, secondary, tertiary, and primary treatments demonstrated decreasing environmental benefits, directly correlated with their respective MP removal efficiencies. These findings underscore the critical role of MP emissions in WWTP life cycle inventories and highlight the urgent need for targeted environmental policies and advanced treatment technologies to address MP contamination in both natural and engineered aquatic systems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper