We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Source, Identification, Distribution, and Abundance of Microplastics in Rivers and Their Ecological Impacts: a Review
Summary
This review synthesizes global data on microplastic sources, identification methods, distribution in rivers, and ecological impacts, covering studies from the past two decades. It finds MPs widespread in riverine systems (up to 120 MPs/L in water, 13,607 MPs/kg in sediment), with FTIR and Raman spectroscopy as dominant identification tools and PE/PP fibers and fragments as the most common polymer types.
Microplastics (MPs) are tiny plastic particles that persist in nature for more than 100 years. This review aimed to illustrate the scenario of global microplastic pollution in various rivers and their ecological impacts. The study collected data from journals, books, and reports published within the last twenty years using multiple search engines such as Google Scholar, ResearchGate, etc. Microplastics (MPs) were found in high abundance in river systems, which act as pathways for from terrestrial to marine ecosystems. FTIR, or Raman spectroscopy, Py-GC-MS, and SEM-EDS were the major instruments to identify MPs. Green or blue-colored fibers or fragments like PE or PP polymers were dominant MPs in rivers. This review found the highest 120 ± 43 MPs/L in water samples collected from Nakdong River, South Korea, whereas the highest 13607 MPs/kg in sediment samples collected from peripheral rivers of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and MPs abundance ranged from 6.3 to 22.21 MPs/fish and 40 MPs/bird. Ingested microplastics can block digestive tracts, reduce nutrient absorption, and lead to starvation, and they can cause exposure to toxins and pathogens. However, it causes bioaccumulation and disrupts food chains and habitats. Therefore, effective mitigation strategies should be adopted to address the microplastic pollution in rivers.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Insights Into Microplastics Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystem: a Short Review of Sampling and Analysis Methods
This review summarizes current methods for sampling and analyzing microplastics in rivers and estuaries, including techniques like FTIR and Raman spectroscopy for polymer identification. The authors highlight the need for standardized sampling and analysis methods to ensure that microplastic data across different studies are reliable and comparable.
Abundance and Distribution of Microplastics in the Water and Riverbank Sediment in Malaysia – A Review
Microplastic abundance and distribution were surveyed in the water column and riverbank sediments of a Malaysian river. Results showed microplastics throughout the river system, with fiber shapes dominating in water and fragments more common in sediments, reflecting contributions from domestic wastewater and plastic litter.
Source- and polymer-specific size distributions of fine microplastics in surface water in an urban river
Researchers investigated size distributions of fine microplastics from different sources in an urban river, finding that weathering and fragmentation produce a range of particle sizes and that source-specific size signatures can help trace microplastic origins.
Microplastics in the sediments of small-scale Japanese rivers: Abundance and distribution, characterization, sources-to-sink, and ecological risks
Researchers characterized microplastic pollution in sediments of four small-scale Japanese rivers, finding widespread contamination and identifying polymer types and potential sources, highlighting that even small river systems serve as microplastic transport pathways.
Comparison of μ-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and py-GCMS as identification tools for microplastic particles and fibers isolated from river sediments
Researchers compared two identification methods — micro-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and pyrolysis-GC-MS — for characterizing microplastics extracted from river sediments, finding that the methods generally agreed on dominant polymers but differed in sensitivity to certain types. The comparison provides practical guidance for choosing analytical methods in freshwater microplastic monitoring programs.