0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Source- and polymer-specific size distributions of fine microplastics in surface water in an urban river

Environmental Pollution 2021 77 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yutaka Kameda, Naofumi Yamada, Emiko Fujita

Summary

Researchers investigated size distributions of fine microplastics from different sources in an urban river, finding that weathering and fragmentation produce a range of particle sizes and that source-specific size signatures can help trace microplastic origins.

Study Type Environmental

There is increasing concern about the environmental behaviors of microplastics (MPs), in particular fine MPs (FMPs), such as their concentrations, sources, size distributions, and fragmentation by weathering in waters. However, there is little information about size distributions of MP polymer types and their relationships to their sources. Here, we analyzed concentrations, compositions, and size distributions of 18 polymer types of MPs of >20 μm by micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy with a novel pretreatment method in surface waters at five sites from the headwaters to the mouth of a Japanese river, and in influent and effluent from a sewage treatment plant (STP). The microplastic concentrations ranged from 300 to 1240 particles/m in surface waters. Cluster analysis identified two primary sources of MPs: residential wastewater at the headwater site and non-point sources from urban areas at downstream sites; concentrations of chemical contaminants from STPs were much higher at the downstream sites. The median particle sizes (D) of MPs increased in urban areas at the downstream sites and were larger than those in influent and effluent. These results imply the release of larger MPs from non-point sources in urban areas. The size distributions of each polymer and all MPs could be fitted significantly to the Weibull distribution function. Values of D, shape parameters, and scale parameters estimated from the functions were useful indicators for evaluating size distributions in detail. A significant positive correlation of D with the tensile strengths of virgin polymers among 13 dominant polymers detected in the surface water suggests that the fragmentation properties of each polymer are influenced by its physical strength. Multidimensional analysis with concentrations, polymeric compositions, and size distributions of MPs, including FMPs, could provide useful information about their sources and their environmental behaviors.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic distribution and their abundance along rivers are determined by land uses and sediment granulometry

Researchers studied two river watersheds and found that microplastics were widespread in both water and sediment, with concentrations in water rising alongside increased urban land use. Interestingly, microplastics trapped in sediment were more influenced by the grain size of the riverbed than by human activity. The findings suggest that both human factors and natural river characteristics work together to shape where microplastics end up in freshwater systems.

Article Tier 2

Urban stormwater microplastic size distribution and impact of subsampling on polymer diversity

Researchers examined how subsampling affects the characterization of microplastics in urban stormwater, finding that small subsamples can underestimate polymer diversity and that fibrous microplastics dominated across urban and suburban sites.

Article Tier 2

Abundance, Distribution and Drivers of Microplastic Contaminant in Urban River Environments

Researchers surveyed microplastic distribution in urban river environments and identified key drivers of accumulation hotspots, finding that land use, hydrology, and infrastructure factors concentrated microplastics at predictable locations that could inform targeted management interventions.

Article Tier 2

Source, Identification, Distribution, and Abundance of Microplastics in Rivers and Their Ecological Impacts: a Review

This review synthesizes global data on microplastic sources, identification methods, distribution in rivers, and ecological impacts, covering studies from the past two decades. It finds MPs widespread in riverine systems (up to 120 MPs/L in water, 13,607 MPs/kg in sediment), with FTIR and Raman spectroscopy as dominant identification tools and PE/PP fibers and fragments as the most common polymer types.

Article Tier 2

Characterizing microplastics in urban runoff: A multi-land use assessment with a focus on 1–125 μm size particles

Researchers collected stormwater runoff from three different urban land use types and found microplastics present across all sites, with significant variation in polymer types depending on the area. By using multiple detection techniques, they were able to identify particles as small as 1 micrometer, revealing that the smallest size fractions dominated the total count. The study emphasizes that urban runoff is a major pathway for microplastic pollution reaching waterways.

Share this paper