We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Combined effects of microplastics and flupyradifurone on gut microbiota and oxidative status of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that honeybees exposed to both polystyrene microplastics and the pesticide flupyradifurone suffered significantly worse health outcomes than when exposed to either substance alone, including reduced survival and disrupted gut bacteria. The combination depleted beneficial Lactobacillus bacteria in the bees' guts, and supplementing with these bacteria improved survival. While focused on bees, this study demonstrates how microplastics can amplify the toxicity of other environmental chemicals, a principle that likely applies across species.
The increasing accumulation of polystyrene microplastics (PS-MPs) and the widespread use of flupyradifurone (FPF) affect honeybee health adversely. However, the combined impact of PS-MPs and FPF toxicity on honeybees remains unknown. In this study, honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) was fed with sucrose solutions containing PS-MPs (0.5 or 5 μm, 50 mg/L), FPF (4 mg/L), or their combination for 21 days under laboratory conditions. The effects of PS-MPs and FPF on honeybee physiology, gut microbiota, and stress-related enzyme activities and genes were measured. The findings showed that concurrent exposure to PS-MPs and FPF significantly reduced honeybee survival, with additive effects, decreased sucrose consumption and body weight, and devastated midgut epithelial cells. FPF was the main stressor affecting survival, while PS-MPs exerted a greater influence on body weight. Co-exposure to PS-MPs (0.5 μm) and FPF disrupted gut microbiota, significantly decreasing Lactobacillus abundance. Supplementation with Lactobacillus helsingborgensis improved honeybee survival, highlighting the protective role of gut microbiota. PS-MPs exposure, alone or combined with FPF, increased oxidative stress and decreased detoxification and immune capabilities in honeybees. These findings suggested the combined toxicity of PS-MPs and FPF on honeybees, underscoring the potential ecology risk posed by multiple stressors.
More Papers Like This
Microplastic ingestion and co-exposure to Nosema ceranae and flupyradifurone reduce the survival of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the combined effects of microplastics, the insecticide flupyradifurone, and the gut parasite Nosema ceranae on honey bee health. They found that all treatments reduced bee survival compared to controls, with the three-way combination being the most harmful, and that microplastics and the pesticide increased parasite reproduction. The study suggests that microplastics may worsen the effects of other stressors on bee health, compounding existing threats to pollinators.
Single and Synergistic Effects of Microplastics and Difenoconazole on Oxidative Stress, Transcriptome, and Microbiome Traits in Honey Bees
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed honey bees to microplastics and the fungicide difenoconazole, both alone and together, and found that the combination caused worse oxidative stress and gut microbiome disruption than either pollutant alone. This is concerning because bees encounter both pollutants in agricultural environments, and the combined exposure may weaken their health more than expected.
Synergistic effects between microplastics and glyphosate on honey bee larvae
AI summary Read the abstract
This study found that honey bee larvae exposed to microplastics combined with the herbicide glyphosate experienced worse developmental problems, higher oxidative stress, and stronger immune responses than those exposed to either pollutant alone. The combined exposure disrupted key detoxification and antioxidant genes in the developing bees. While focused on bees, this research highlights how microplastics can amplify the harm from other environmental chemicals, a pattern that likely applies to other organisms including humans.
Unravelling the microplastic menace: different polymers work in synergy to increase bee vulnerability
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the effects of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) microplastics, both individually and combined, on honeybees. They found that the mixture of different microplastic polymers produced synergistic harmful effects that were worse than either polymer alone, including increased mortality and disrupted gut microbiota. The study highlights that real-world microplastic exposure, which typically involves mixtures of polymers, may pose greater risks to pollinators than single-polymer laboratory studies suggest.
Effects of different microplastic types and co-exposure on the survival of Apis mellifera ligustica (Spinola, 1806) and its associated microbial communities
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers fed honey bees three types of microplastics (polystyrene, polyethylene, and polymethyl methacrylate) individually and in combination, and found that all treatments significantly reduced bee survival compared to controls. The combination of all three microplastic types had the strongest negative effect, and the gut microbial community showed time- and treatment-specific shifts that may represent an initial compensatory response to maintain functional stability.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.