0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Impact of Microplastics on Global Public Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Preprints.org 2025 Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ioannis Adamopoulos, Antonios Valamontes

Summary

This meta-analysis pools data from multiple studies to assess how microplastics affect human health. It finds that people are widely exposed through contaminated food, water, and air, and that animal studies link microplastics to oxidative stress, immune disruption, and hormone interference. However, direct human health effects still need more long-term research to confirm.

Background: Microplastics (MP(s)) are an emerging environmental contaminant with growing concerns about their potential impact on human health. These particles, measuring less than 5 mm, are pervasive in the environment and have been detected in food, water, air, and human biological tissues. Despite increasing awareness, limited studies explore MP(s) exposure and its health risks. Research remains sparse on the breakdown of larger plastic fragments in biological systems and their long-term effects. Standardized exposure assessment methods, harmonized effect size reporting, and regulatory interventions are urgently needed. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesize current evidence on human MP(s) exposure pathways, associated health risks, and knowledge gaps. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL, to assess the extent of MP(s) exposure and its possible health implications. Results: Findings suggest widespread exposure through ingestion of food and water contamination, inhalation of airborne MP(s), and potential dermal absorption. Toxicological studies in animal models indicate that MP(s) can induce oxidative stress, metabolic dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and endocrine disruption. However, direct human health effects remain unclear due to methodological limitations, variability in exposure assessment, and a lack of long-term studies. Emerging research highlights concerns regarding neurological toxicity, reproductive health effects, and atmospheric transport mechanisms. Conclusions: The study analyzes the impact of MP(s) on public health, emphasizing the necessity for regulation and methods to limit its effects on ecosystems and humans. The findings highlight the importance of developing uniform guidelines for healthy persons, given the diversity in reported studies and the lack of existing guidelines. This global issue needs immediate action. Future research should prioritize longitudinal human studies, improved plastic detection techniques, and risk characterization frameworks to understand the public health implications of plastic exposure.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Meta Analysis Tier 1

The Impact of Microplastics on Global Public Health, Distribution, and Contamination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from 78 studies and confirmed that microplastics enter the human body through food, air, and skin contact, with particles found in blood, placentas, and stool. The research links microplastic exposure to inflammation, oxidative stress, hormonal disruption, and gut microbiome changes, underscoring the need for regulatory action on plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

The potential effects of microplastics on human health: What is known and what is unknown

This review summarizes what is currently known about how microplastics might affect human health, noting that while contamination is widespread in food, water, and air, direct evidence of harm in humans is still limited. Studies in animals and cell cultures suggest microplastics could trigger immune responses, cause inflammation, and affect reproduction and development. The authors call for more rigorous clinical studies to determine whether the levels of microplastics that people actually encounter pose real health risks.

Review Tier 2

Potential Health Impact of Microplastics: A Review of Environmental Distribution, Human Exposure, and Toxic Effects

This review summarizes existing research on how microplastics are found throughout the environment and in human samples, entering the body through food, air, and skin contact. Lab studies in cells and animals show microplastics can cause oxidative stress, DNA damage, immune reactions, brain toxicity, and reproductive harm, and early human health data links microplastic exposure to several chronic diseases.

Systematic Review Tier 1

A Systematic Review on the Impact of Micro-Nanoplastics Exposure on Human Health and Diseases

This systematic review summarizes existing research on how micro and nanoplastic exposure affects human health and may contribute to disease. The evidence suggests that these tiny particles can enter the body through food, water, air, and even cosmetics, potentially causing inflammation, oxidative stress, and disruptions to the immune and reproductive systems.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

Impact of Microplastic Exposure on Human Health: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Outcomes

This systematic review found that microplastics have been detected in human blood, placental tissue, and gastrointestinal samples, with proposed health mechanisms including oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, endocrine disruption, and gut microbiome alterations. While direct clinical evidence remains limited, the accumulating laboratory and observational data point to microplastics as a plausible contributor to multiple disease pathways.

Share this paper