0
Article Tier 2 Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Toxicity and absorption of polystyrene micro-nanoplastics in healthy and Crohn’s disease human duodenum-chip models

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025 16 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Using an advanced gut-on-a-chip model built from human intestinal cells, researchers found that 25-nanometer polystyrene particles could cross the intestinal barrier through both passive leaking and active cell transport. The nanoplastics also turned down a gene involved in immune defense (IFI6), suggesting that even without causing obvious cell damage, nanoplastics may weaken the gut's ability to fight off infections.

Polymers
Body Systems

Micro and nanoplastics (MNPs) are widespread environmental and food web contaminants that are absorbed by the intestine and distributed systemically, but the mechanisms of uptake are not well understood. In a triculture small intestinal epithelial model, we previously found that uptake of 26 nm polystyrene MNPs (PS26) occurred by both passive diffusion and active actin- and dynamin-dependent mechanisms. However, studies in a more physiologically relevant model are required to validate those results. Here, a microfluidic intestine-on-a-chip model was developed using primary human intestinal epithelial organoids from healthy and Crohn's disease donors, and used to evaluate the toxicity and mechanisms effectuating uptake of 25 nm polystyrene shell-gold core tracer MNPs (AuPS25). AuPS25 caused minimal toxicity after 24 h exposure in either healthy or Crohn's IOC models. RNAseq analysis of epithelial cells identified 9 genes dysregulated by AuPS25, including downregulation of IFI6 (interferon alpha-induced protein 6). Because IFI6 has important antiviral and immunosuppressive functions in the intestine, its downregulation suggests impairment of innate immune function, which could have important negative health consequences. Inhibitor studies revealed that AuPS25 uptake in the IOC occurred by both passive diffusion and active actin- and dynamin-dependent mechanisms, consistent with our previous findings in the triculture model.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Polystyrene nanoplastics disrupt the intestinal microenvironment by altering bacteria-host interactions through extracellular vesicle-delivered microRNAs

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that polystyrene nanoplastics disrupt the gut lining in mice by altering tiny RNA molecules that control the production of protective proteins in the intestinal barrier. The nanoplastics also caused an imbalance in gut bacteria, creating a chain reaction where damaged gut cells release particles that further weaken the intestinal barrier and change the microbiome.

Review Tier 2

Mapping the biological effects of micro- and nanoplastics in mammalian intestinal models: a scoping review.

AI summary Read the abstract

This review summarizes 90 studies on how tiny plastic particles affect gut health, mostly using lab-grown human intestinal cells rather than live animals. Most research used one plastic type (polystyrene) and nanosized particles, finding effects like cell stress, inflammation, and disruption of the gut's protective barrier.

Article Tier 2

Interactions of polystyrene nanoplastics with in vitro models of the human intestinal barrier

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers assessed the effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on two in vitro models simulating the human intestinal barrier and its associated immune system. The study found that while cell viability and membrane integrity were largely maintained, the nanoparticles were able to interact with and translocate across the intestinal cell layers, raising questions about potential long-term exposure effects.

Article Tier 2

Mechanisms of ingested polystyrene micro-nanoplastics (MNPs) uptake and translocation in an in vitro tri-culture small intestinal epithelium

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used a sophisticated laboratory model of the human small intestine to study how micro- and nanoplastics cross the gut barrier after simulated digestion. They found that smaller nanoplastics were absorbed more efficiently than larger microplastics, and the particles used multiple cellular pathways to cross the intestinal lining. The study provides new evidence about the mechanisms by which ingested plastic particles could potentially reach the bloodstream.

Article Tier 2

Caco-2-derived spheroids and organ-on-a-chip for food safety risk assessment: mechanisms of intestinal inflammation induced by 20 nm polystyrene nanoplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested tiny plastic particles called nanoplastics on lab-grown clusters of human gut cells and a microchip model of the gut lining. Exposure to the plastic particles caused signs of oxidative stress, inflammation, and changes in gut cell function, and computer analysis pointed to a gene called ALOX5 as possibly involved.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper