0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Revealing antagonistic interactions in the adverse effects of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) microplastics in bumblebees

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
David Baracchi Federico Ferrante, Federico Ferrante, Elisa Pasquini, Elisa Pasquini, Federico Cappa, Federico Cappa, David Baracchi Elisa Pasquini, Federico Ferrante, Elisa Pasquini, Elisa Pasquini, Elisa Pasquini, Federico Ferrante, Federico Cappa, Federico Cappa, Alessia Ibraliu, Alessia Ibraliu, Alessia Ibraliu, Alessia Ibraliu, Ginevra Muti, Ginevra Muti, Ginevra Muti, Ginevra Muti, Federico Ferrante, David Baracchi David Baracchi Federico Ferrante, David Baracchi David Baracchi David Baracchi David Baracchi David Baracchi Federico Ferrante, David Baracchi

Summary

Researchers exposed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) to polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) microplastics singly and in combination to assess sublethal effects on survival, feeding behavior, and memory. Single-type exposures reduced survival in a concentration-dependent manner but combined exposure showed antagonistic (no significant) survival effects; PMMA impaired memory while the mixture enhanced sucrose responsiveness, revealing complex interaction effects.

Polymers

Microplastics pose a significant ecological threat, yet their actual impact on terrestrial ecosystems and organisms remains poorly understood. This study investigates the effects of two common microplastics, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polystyrene (PS), on the pollinator <i>Bombus terrestris</i>, exploring their combined and sublethal effects at three different concentrations (0.5, 5 and 50 mg l<sup>-1</sup>). PMMA and PS single exposure reduced bee survival in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas combined exposure (MIX) had no significant effect. PS reduced bee sucrose responsiveness, PMMA had no significant effect and MIX enhanced it. Learning and memory tests showed impaired mid-term and early long-term memory in bees exposed to PMMA and PS, with concentration-dependent effects. Interestingly, MIX exposure had no effect on memory retention. Our findings emphasize the differential effects of individual microplastics on bumblebee behaviour, suggesting potential risks to pollinator survival, cognitive function and possibly overall colony health, but also unexpected antagonistic interactions between these pollutants. The PS-PMMA antagonistic interactions highlight a challenge in assessing the toxicity of microplastics. Combined effects may not mirror the individual toxicity of PS and PMMA, highlighting the need for a careful assessment of polymer interactions, especially in environments or organisms contaminated by different microplastics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper