0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Microplastics affect the nitrogen nutrition status of soybean by altering the nitrogen cycle in the rhizosphere soil

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2025 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 53 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yuanfu Li, Liu L, Xingpan Meng, Jingsi Qiu, Yanmei Liu, Fengyun Zhao, Huihua Tan

Summary

Researchers investigated how three types of microplastics — polystyrene, polyethylene, and polyvinyl chloride — affect soybean growth by altering nitrogen cycling in the root-zone soil. They found that polyethylene and polystyrene promoted nitrogen availability and soybean growth, while polyvinyl chloride disrupted the nitrogen cycle, reduced beneficial soil microorganisms, and inhibited plant growth. The study suggests that different types of microplastics can have opposing effects on crop nutrition through their impact on soil microbial communities.

Microplastics (MPs) are widely distributed in agricultural systems. However, studies on the comprehensive effects of MPs on nitrogen cycling in crop rhizosphere soil, and the changes this effect causes to crop growth is still limited. In this study, we investigated how three types of 5 % MPs (polystyrene, PS; polyethylene, PE; polyvinyl chloride, PVC) affect soybean growth by altering rhizosphere soil nitrogen cycling. These MPs have no direct toxic effects on soybean under hydroponic conditions. However, under soil cultivation conditions, PE and PS promoted soybean growth and increased soybean roots nitrogen content and nitrogen assimilation enzyme activity, while PVC does the opposite. Further study found that PE and PS increased the inorganic nitrogen content, and the activity of nitrogen cycle-related enzymes and the abundance of genes and microorganism in rhizosphere soil. Meanwhile, PVC significantly reduced the inorganic nitrogen contents, inhibited the activity of nitrogen cycling related enzymes, and destroyed the microbial community structure in rhizosphere soil. More importantly, PVC significantly reduced the abundance of nitrogen cycle-related genes and microorganisms, and increased the abundance of viruses. These results indicated that PE and PS promote soybean growth by activating the nitrogen cycle in the rhizosphere soil and increasing the soil nitrogen content, whereas PVC inhibits soybean growth by disrupting the nitrogen cycle in the rhizosphere soil and reducing its nitrogen content.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Sub-micron microplastics affect nitrogen cycling by altering microbial abundance and activities in a soil-legume system

Researchers found that very small (sub-micron) polyethylene and polypropylene microplastics in soil significantly altered nitrogen cycling by changing the abundance and activity of bacteria around soybean roots. While the microplastics did not affect plant growth directly, they increased nitrogen uptake and shifted the balance of nitrogen-processing bacteria. These hidden changes to soil chemistry could have long-term effects on agricultural productivity and the nutritional quality of crops.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics affect soybean rhizosphere microbial composition and function during vegetative and reproductive stages

Researchers conducted a 70-day greenhouse experiment to evaluate how four types of microplastics affect soybean rhizosphere bacterial communities in two soil types. The study found that polyamide microplastics consistently altered bacterial diversity and nitrogen cycling functions, while other plastic types had shorter-term effects, suggesting that different microplastics pose varying risks to agricultural soil microbial ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Effects of microplastic contamination on soil nitrogen and its bioavailability in soybean-maize rotation system

Researchers conducting a field experiment found that microplastics in agricultural soil disrupt the nitrogen cycle in a soybean-maize rotation system, inhibiting the natural nitrogen fixation that legumes provide and increasing the conversion of ammonium to nitrate — a form more prone to leaching away — raising concerns for long-term soil fertility.

Article Tier 2

Macroplastics in soybean cultivation: Neutral on plant growth but disruptive to nitrogen-fixing microbiome

Researchers studied how larger plastic debris (over 2 centimeters) in agricultural soil affects soybean growth and the nitrogen cycle over a 71-day experiment. While the macroplastics did not visibly affect plant growth, they significantly disrupted nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities and altered soil nitrogen chemistry. The study suggests that even when crop yields appear unaffected, plastic contamination in farmland may be quietly undermining the beneficial soil microorganisms that plants depend on.

Article Tier 2

Polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride microplastics promote soil nitrification and alter the composition of key nitrogen functional bacterial groups

Researchers found that polyethylene and PVC microplastics in soil increased nitrification (a key step in the nitrogen cycle) and changed the composition of nitrogen-processing bacteria. These changes could affect soil fertility and the availability of nutrients for crops. The study highlights how microplastic contamination in agricultural soil may have hidden effects on food production by altering fundamental soil processes.

Share this paper