We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Towards uniform metrological processes for the characterization and analysis of microplastics?
Summary
This study examines the lack of standardization across the multi-step analytical process for marine microplastic characterization -- from sampling through sample preparation to spectroscopic analysis -- highlighting how qualitative and quantitative variability between laboratories hinders the development of reliable numerical models for plastic transport in oceanographic flows.
Plastic debris is a widespread pollutant of the marine environment. In the recent years, most research focused on small plastic particles, so-called microplastics “MP” (particle size: 1 µm–5 mm). The assessment of environmental MP pollution requires a multi-step analytical process beginning by a sampling, then a sample preparation to realize a particulate characterization. All the process needs to be adapted to each kind of samples (seawater, sediment, biota). Unfortunately, this analysis is subject to great qualitative and quantitative variabilities due to the absence of a regulatory framework from sample preparation to analysis. Moreover, the acquired data feed the development of numerical models of particle movement in large oceanographic flows regardless of their sizes, shapes and chemical natures. In consequent, the robustness and repeatability of the analyses are essential to validate and refine these models. Work requiring the optimization of preparation and analysis methods or the establishment of uniform metrological processes is becoming essential.Nevertheless, to estimate uncertainties, it is necessary to establish models that allow working with particles similar to those found in the environment. However, only calibrated plastic microbeads are available on the market, which is far from being representative of current pollution. There is therefore a strong demand for standardized microplastic fragments of various polymers. Different teams are working on this purpose but they all encounter the difficulty of separating small fragments (
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Methods for sampling, processing, identification,and quantification of microplastics in the marine environment
This paper reviews and compares the various methods used to collect, process, identify, and quantify microplastics across different environmental samples. It highlights the lack of standardized protocols as a major obstacle to comparing results across studies and calls for methodological harmonization.
A review of methods for measuring microplastics in aquatic environments
This review critically evaluates methods used to measure microplastics in aquatic environments, covering sampling design, sample processing, and spectroscopic identification, and identifies the most significant sources of methodological variation. Standardizing these methods is essential for generating comparable data across studies and enabling robust environmental risk assessment.
Analytical precision assessment for microplastic analyses
Researchers demonstrated methods for assessing analytical precision in microplastic analysis through initial and continuing laboratory evaluations, establishing repeatability and reproducibility benchmarks to address the widely reported need for improved accuracy in microplastic measurement data.
Innovative reference materials for method validation in microplastic analysis including interlaboratory comparison exercises
Researchers developed innovative reference materials for validating microplastic analysis methods, presenting interlaboratory comparison results that support quality assurance and standardization in the growing field of microplastic detection.
A Review of Analytical Methods Used in Microplastics Quantification
This review evaluates the various analytical methods used to detect and quantify microplastics in the environment, highlighting inconsistencies in sampling and analysis across studies. Standardizing methods is a critical priority for the field, as inconsistent approaches make it difficult to compare results and track pollution trends over time.