We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Analytical precision assessment for microplastic analyses
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers demonstrated methods for assessing analytical precision in microplastic analysis through initial and continuing laboratory evaluations, establishing repeatability and reproducibility benchmarks to address the widely reported need for improved accuracy in microplastic measurement data.
The need for improved microplastic (MP) data accuracy has been widely reported, but MP precision issues have been investigated less thoroughly. This work demonstrates how initial and continuing assessments of a laboratory's analytical precision can be used for establishing laboratory repeatability for MP analyses. These precision estimates can be reported along with MP results to ensure their quality and compare them meaningfully to other data. Re-analyses of reference MP samples can be used to assess and compare precision between different laboratories. A multi-lab precision exercise was demonstrated using infrared (IR) standard test methods performed on reference samples consisting of low-concentration MP spikes in both clean water and wastewater matrices. Each lab repeated their IR analyses 7 times and calculated relative standard deviations (RSD) for each detected polymer type using a standardized template. All labs' MP methods yielded generally repeatable results, though RSDs were consistently higher for lower MP counts. The reported range of total MP counts per sample was 8-33 particles, and the observed RSDs were 0.1-0.6. These RSDs were the same or lower than the expected imprecision due to random (Poisson) counting error alone, suggesting that these automated methods did not contribute any additional variability, and had slightly better reproducibility than expected for independent recounts. The wastewater matrix exhibited numerous interfering particles but did not yield more variability than the clean water matrix. The low-count design is a worst case for precision but is appropriate for some real-world sample concentrations. In practice, labs could generate separate references for precision assessment at multiple MP ranges (e.g., high, medium, and low.) The RSDs obtained from this data can be used to generate QC charts, detect changes in analyst performance, compare to Poisson error to identify additional sources of imprecision, and determine target filtration and instrumental parameters for MP analyses.
More Papers Like This
Innovative reference materials for method validation in microplastic analysis including interlaboratory comparison exercises
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed innovative reference materials for validating microplastic analysis methods, presenting interlaboratory comparison results that support quality assurance and standardization in the growing field of microplastic detection.
The use of reference material in microplastic research: general aspects
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper discussed general considerations for using certified reference materials in microplastic research, arguing that standardized reference materials are essential for ensuring that measurements are reproducible and comparable across different laboratories and studies. The lack of such standards remains a major limitation in the field.
Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods
AI summary Read the abstract
An 84-laboratory interlaboratory comparison tested the accuracy of five established microplastic detection methods using standardized reference materials, revealing significant variability in results across labs and methods. The study highlights that standardization and harmonization of analytical procedures are urgently needed before microplastic measurement can be reliably compared across research groups.
A novel proof of concept approach towards generating reference microplastic particles
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper presented a proof-of-concept approach for generating standardized reference microplastic particles to improve comparability across analytical methods. The lack of consistent reference materials has been a key barrier to producing reliable and comparable microplastic research data.
Towards uniform metrological processes for the characterization and analysis of microplastics?
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examines the lack of standardization across the multi-step analytical process for marine microplastic characterization -- from sampling through sample preparation to spectroscopic analysis -- highlighting how qualitative and quantitative variability between laboratories hinders the development of reliable numerical models for plastic transport in oceanographic flows.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.