0
Article Tier 2 Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Biochar alleviates nanoplastics and bisphenol A mediated immunological, neurological and gut microbial toxicity in channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus

Chemosphere 2025 4 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated whether biochar, a carbon-rich material made from organic waste, could reduce the toxic effects of nanoplastics and bisphenol A on channel catfish. They found that adding biochar to the water significantly lessened tissue damage, immune disruption, and harmful changes to gut bacteria caused by these contaminants. The study suggests biochar could serve as a practical tool for mitigating plastic-related pollution in aquaculture environments.

Nanoplastics (NPs) and bisphenol A (BPA), exhibit abundant industrial applications, are produced in large volumes and ubiquitously released into the environment, posing a serious threat to ecological and human health. Biochar has been extensively studied for its ability to mitigate the negative effects of contaminants on plants. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether biochar co-exposure with polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPs, size 80 nm) and BPA mitigate their toxic impacts on Ictalurus punctatus and maintain its normal growth. The I. punctatus was exposed individually to PS-NPs (0.5 mg/L) and BPA (0.2 mg/L) as well as co-exposed to PS-NPs + biochar and BPA + biochar for 7 days. Results showed PS-NPs and BPA single exposure caused tissue damage in terms of hepatocyte swelling and gut villi diffusion, and induced oxidative stress. PS-NPs and BPA single exposures led to significant changes in enzymatic activities and genetic expressions of biomarkers related to the immune system, producing inflammatory response. It also led to dysregulation of neurotransmitter enzymes (ACH, ChAT, AChE) and overexpression of neuron genes, resulting in neurotoxicity. Moreover, there was an increase in the diversity and alteration in composition of the gut microbiota (Plesiomonas, Pseudomonas), resulting in dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. However, biochar presence (0.5 g/L) reduced the accumulation of PS-NPs and BPA in fish and contributed to various degrees of mitigation for the toxic impacts of PS-NPs and BPA. Overall, biochar helped to mitigate the negative effects of PS-NPs and BPA on oxidative stress, histopathology, immune system, neurological responses and gut microbiota. This study emphasized the potential of biochar to mitigate the negative impacts of NPs and BPA on aquatic organisms.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastic-Induced Gut Microbiome–Immune Crosstalk in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Multi-Omics Insights and Mitigation Strategies for Sustainable Aquaculture

AI summary Read the abstract

This review summarizes existing research on microplastic pollution in farmed Nile tilapia, describing how microplastics disrupt gut bacteria balance, trigger inflammation and damage in the intestine and liver, and affect young fish more than adults. It also covers possible warning signs (biomarkers) and studies that tested probiotics and biochar against these effects.

Article Tier 2

Combined exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics and bisphenol A induces hepato- and intestinal-toxicity and disturbs gut microbiota in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed channel catfish to nanoplastics and bisphenol A, both alone and combined, and found the combination caused more severe liver and intestinal damage than either substance alone. The co-exposure also disrupted gut bacteria in ways that amplified toxicity. Since nanoplastics and BPA commonly co-exist in polluted water, their combined effects on aquatic organisms may be worse than what single-pollutant studies suggest.

Article Tier 2

Polystyrene nanoplastics sequester the toxicity mitigating potential of probiotics by altering gut microbiota in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers tested whether probiotic pretreatment could protect grass carp from the toxic effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on gut health. While probiotics initially boosted immune responses and reduced intestinal damage, the protective effect was not strong enough to fully counteract nanoplastic toxicity over time. The study suggests that nanoplastics can undermine the gut health benefits of probiotics by disrupting the balance of gut bacteria.

Article Tier 2

Impact of Chlorella vulgaris Bioremediation and Selenium on Genotoxicity, Nephrotoxicity and Oxidative/Antioxidant Imbalance Induced by Polystyrene Nanoplastics in African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that polystyrene nanoplastics caused DNA damage, kidney injury, and oxidative stress in African catfish. The study suggests that treatment with the green algae Chlorella vulgaris and the mineral selenium helped reduce these harmful effects, pointing to potential protective strategies against nanoplastic toxicity in aquaculture.

Article Tier 2

Impact of Chlorella vulgaris Bioremediation and Selenium on Genotoxicity, Nephrotoxicity and Oxidative/Antioxidant Imbalance Induced by Polystyrene Nanoplastics in African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers exposed African catfish to polystyrene nanoplastics and found the particles caused DNA damage, kidney tissue changes, and oxidative stress. Supplementing the fish diet with the algae Chlorella vulgaris or the mineral selenium significantly reduced these harmful effects. The study suggests that certain natural supplements may help protect aquatic organisms from nanoplastic-related damage.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper