We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The scientification of risks and the risks of scientification
Summary
This chapter investigates the use of 'scientification' as a discursive strategy in Swedish public debates about microplastics and artificial turf pitches, analyzing how a 2016 report attributing major microplastic emissions to tire wear and turf granules became a contested scientific authority in policy debates. The author examines how scientific uncertainty is mobilized and shaped in public and political discourse around environmental risk.
In 2016, a report commissioned by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency found that tyre wear from road traffic and granules from artificial turf pitches were the two biggest microplastic sources in Swedish aquatic environments. Although the report’s figures were surrounded by uncertainty, they became artillery in a public debate that followed about microplastics and the environmental hazards tied to artificial turf pitches. Against this backdrop, this chapter aims to understand the use of scientification, here understood as a discursive strategy that attributes scientific nature to an issue, in the news media coverage of microplastics and artificial turf pitches. This chapter discusses the role of scientification in the discursive struggle over environmental risks, a strategy that, as shown, could be used to attach either certainty or uncertainty to an issue, as well as to create fallacious argumentation. This chapter points to the need that the media guards the discursive use of science when reporting on environmental risks, in order not to relativise or water down the authority of science in public discourse.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
An environmental problem in the making: how media logic molds scientific uncertainty in the production of news about artificial turf in Sweden
Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 journalists, editors, public officials, politicians, industry representatives, and experts in Sweden to examine how media logic shapes news coverage of artificial turf as a microplastic pollutant, finding that media framing conventions drive interpretations of scientific uncertainty and amplify the issue as an environmental problem.
On the Creation of Risk: Framing of Microplastics Risks in Science and Media
This study analyzes how microplastic risks are framed in scientific literature and media coverage, finding that scientific uncertainty is often amplified into public alarm through media framing, and examining the social construction of environmental risk in the absence of definitive toxicological evidence.
Communicating scientific uncertainties: Effects of message and audience characteristics in the context of microplastic health risks
Researchers conducted an experiment with over 1,100 participants in Austria to study how communicating scientific uncertainty about microplastic health risks affects public perception. They found that emphasizing a lack of scientific consensus led to lower risk perception and indirectly reduced support for related policies. Framing uncertainty as remaining knowledge gaps rather than disagreement among scientists produced less negative effects on public engagement.
Risk perception and risk realities in forming legally binding agreements: The governance of plastics
This study examines how public perception of plastic pollution risk influences the development of legally binding international agreements to address it. Researchers found that while initial public concern focused on human health effects of microplastics, emerging scientific evidence suggests the broader environmental impacts may be the more pressing issue. The study argues that effective plastic governance requires aligning risk perception with scientific evidence to build support for comprehensive policy solutions.
Exploring public risk perceptions of microplastics: Findings from a cross‐national qualitative interview study among German and Italian citizens
Researchers conducted interviews with citizens in Germany and Italy to understand how ordinary people think about the risks of microplastics. They found that people often transferred their knowledge about large plastic pollution to microplastics, used concepts like accumulation and dose-response to reason about risks, and saw environmental and human health threats as closely connected. The study suggests that public risk perceptions of microplastics are shaped by intuitive reasoning and personal experiences rather than formal scientific knowledge.