0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Exploring public risk perceptions of microplastics: Findings from a cross‐national qualitative interview study among German and Italian citizens

Risk Analysis 2023 24 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Robin Janzik, Sabine Pahl Robin Janzik, Robin Janzik, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Mathew P. White, Mathew P. White, Mathew P. White, Severine Koch, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Mathew P. White, Sabine Pahl Giorgia Zamariola, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Mathew P. White, Domagoj Vrbos, Mathew P. White, Mathew P. White, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Severine Koch, Domagoj Vrbos, Mathew P. White, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Mathew P. White, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Domagoj Vrbos, Sabine Pahl Natalie Berger, Natalie Berger, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl

Summary

Researchers conducted interviews with citizens in Germany and Italy to understand how ordinary people think about the risks of microplastics. They found that people often transferred their knowledge about large plastic pollution to microplastics, used concepts like accumulation and dose-response to reason about risks, and saw environmental and human health threats as closely connected. The study suggests that public risk perceptions of microplastics are shaped by intuitive reasoning and personal experiences rather than formal scientific knowledge.

Microplastics are receiving growing attention in the public debate, while the scientific assessment of risks of microplastics to ecological and human health is still ongoing. Previous studies suggest concerns among the general public with country-specific differences. However, little is known about the reasoning underlying these concerns. By conducting qualitative interviews with German (n = 15) and Italian citizens (n = 15), this study adopted a cross-national perspective to investigate which concepts shape citizens' perceptions of microplastics. A qualitative content analysis was used, with coding categories and subcategories developed inductively. Results showed that interviewees formed assumptions around microplastics despite own uncertainties, transferred knowledge from macro- to microplastics, and used the concepts of accumulation and dose-response relationship to make sense of the topic. Moreover, they saw the domains of human health and the environment as intertwined and expressed helplessness when discussing solutions to the microplastics issue. Many themes on the topic were similar in both samples, but there were also some differences. For instance, whereas Italian participants talked about marine-related microplastics, German participants talked about airborne sources; also, German participants tended to recognize more strongly the actions their country was putting in place to address the problem. These findings underscore the need for proactive risk communication despite remaining gaps in scientific risk assessment. Beyond providing technical information, communicators should consider the reasoning behind risk perception on microplastics and address scientific uncertainty as well as the interconnectedness between the domains of human health and the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper