We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Divergent aging patterns of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic sheets and their differential associations with soil carbon stability.
AI summary Read the abstract
A nine-month outdoor experiment buried biodegradable (PLA) and conventional (PVC) plastic sheets in soil, finding they aged differently: PLA cracked and broke apart, while PVC roughened. The plastics affected nearby soil microbes and carbon differently, suggesting biodegradable plastic labels do not guarantee a particular environmental effect.
Plastic pollution is a growing concern. Plastic particles undergo aging that changes their properties and ecological impacts, yet how different polymers age in natural settings and relate to soil carbon cycling remains unclear. We conducted a nine-month in situ experiment to compare the aging of biodegradable PLA (polylactic acid) and conventional PVC (polyvinyl chloride) sheets and to assess their associations with soil microbial communities, enzymes, and organic carbon fractions. PLA surfaces developed hydrolysis‑induced cracks and fragmentation, whereas PVC showed oxidative roughening. These aging patterns were associated with divergent functional potential of plastisphere microbial communities. PLA‑associated soils had higher β-glucosidase and peroxidase activities, together with a trend toward higher labile carbon (FPOC) indicators than PVC‑associated soils. Mineral‑associated organic carbon (MAOC) did not differ between treatments, but MAOC proportion was negatively correlated with bulk density only under PLA. Because our study lacked an unamended control, our conclusions are limited to PLA-PVC comparisons. Our findings show that the two polymers differ in aging pathways, microbial associations, and associations with labile carbon turnover that vary with soil physical properties, suggesting that the environmental implications of biodegradable plastics cannot be assumed from their label alone.
More Papers Like This
Mechanism of polyethylene and biodegradable microplastic aging effects on soil organic carbon fractions in different land-use types
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics at different stages of aging affect soil organic carbon fractions across various land-use types. The study found that both types of microplastics altered soil carbon dynamics, but the effects depended on the plastic type, its degree of aging, and the specific land-use context.
Discrepant soil microbial community and C cycling function responses to conventional and biodegradable microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics affect soil microbial communities and carbon cycling. Researchers found that the two types of microplastics had markedly different effects, with biodegradable plastics causing more changes to microbial community structure and carbon-related gene activity. The study suggests that biodegradable plastics, while designed to be more environmentally friendly, may still significantly alter soil biology.
Impacts of pristine, aged and leachate of conventional and biodegradable plastics on plant growth and soil organic carbon
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of conventional plastics (polyethylene, polypropylene) and biodegradable alternatives (polyhydroxybutyrate, polylactic acid) on ryegrass growth and soil health in both pristine and aged forms. They found that all plastic types, whether conventional or biodegradable, reduced plant biomass, lowered soil pH and organic matter, and increased CO2 respiration rates. The study provides evidence that biodegradable plastics are not necessarily safer for soil ecosystems than conventional plastics.
Biodegradable microplastics decreased plant-derived and increased microbial-derived carbon formation in soil: a two-year field trial
AI summary Read the abstract
A two-year field experiment compared the effects of conventional (polypropylene) and biodegradable (polylactic acid, PLA) microplastics on soil carbon cycling in agricultural soil. Researchers found that while neither plastic type changed total soil carbon levels, PLA microplastics significantly reduced plant-derived carbon (lignin) by 32% while boosting microbial-derived carbon, suggesting that "biodegradable" plastics still meaningfully alter soil biology and chemistry. This matters because it challenges the assumption that biodegradable plastics are environmentally benign once they break down in farmland.
Differential carbon accumulation of microbial necromass and plant lignin by pollution of polyethylene and polylactic acid microplastics in soil
AI summary Read the abstract
This study found that both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics changed how carbon is stored in soil. The plastics increased carbon from dead microbes while decreasing carbon from plant material, with most of the additional soil carbon coming from fungal remains. These changes to soil chemistry matter because they could affect agricultural productivity and the ability of soil to store carbon, with broader implications for climate and food systems.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.